EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Optimization of Voltage Security with Placement of FACTS Device Using Modified Newton–Raphson Approach: A Case Study of Nigerian Transmission Network

Ewaoche John Okampo, Nnamdi Nwulu and Pitshou N. Bokoro
Additional contact information
Ewaoche John Okampo: Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg P.O. Box 524, South Africa
Nnamdi Nwulu: Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg P.O. Box 524, South Africa
Pitshou N. Bokoro: Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg P.O. Box 524, South Africa

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 12, 1-17

Abstract: Power flow reliability, voltage security and transmission congestion management are paramount operational issues in a power system. Flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) controllers are suitable technologies that can provide compensation and dynamic control of power system transmission parameters to enhance effective performance and reliability. The interline power flow controller (IPFC), if optimally placed, can regulate the impedance of multiple lines to improve active power transfer capacity and voltage profile. This study examines the performance of IPFCs for voltage enhancement by suppressing fluctuation. A modified Newton–Raphson load flow problem with an incorporated IPFC variable has been formulated with the objective to improve voltage stability and maintain active power flow. The effectiveness of the proposed method was tested on the Nigerian 41 bus transmission network. The obtained result of the system with an IPFC placed at the weakest bus of the network was compared with Newton–Raphson load flow analysis of the same network without an IPFC. The results of load flow analysis for Case 1 (the system without an IPFC) showed that the transmission network without an IPFC had a real power loss of 4.699488 p.u., and reactive power loss of 4.467413 p.u., whereas the integration of an IPFC to the power flow formation in Case 2 resulted in the reduction in the transmission network’s overall losses to 0.55297 p.u. and −38.3329 p.u. The modified method proves effective as the power system network with an IPFC returns a more stable voltage profile and improves active power flow. In addition, this method, similar to all other mathematical optimization approaches, returns a strong accurate result but may be a drawback in terms of longer computational time compared with metaheuristic methods which are preferred for a larger network system.

Keywords: FACTS devices; IPFC; voltage stability; power system transmission (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4211/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4211/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4211-:d:833764

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4211-:d:833764