EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Anaerobic Digestion of Pig Slurry in Fixed-Bed and Expanded Granular Sludge Bed Reactors

Jurek Häner, Tobias Weide, Alexander Naßmacher, Roberto Eloy Hernández Regalado, Christof Wetter and Elmar Brügging
Additional contact information
Jurek Häner: Faculty of Energy Building Services Environmental Engineering, Münster University of Applied Sciences, Stegerwaldstr. 39, 48565 Steinfurt, Germany
Tobias Weide: Faculty of Energy Building Services Environmental Engineering, Münster University of Applied Sciences, Stegerwaldstr. 39, 48565 Steinfurt, Germany
Alexander Naßmacher: Faculty of Energy Building Services Environmental Engineering, Münster University of Applied Sciences, Stegerwaldstr. 39, 48565 Steinfurt, Germany
Roberto Eloy Hernández Regalado: Faculty of Energy Building Services Environmental Engineering, Münster University of Applied Sciences, Stegerwaldstr. 39, 48565 Steinfurt, Germany
Christof Wetter: Faculty of Energy Building Services Environmental Engineering, Münster University of Applied Sciences, Stegerwaldstr. 39, 48565 Steinfurt, Germany
Elmar Brügging: Faculty of Energy Building Services Environmental Engineering, Münster University of Applied Sciences, Stegerwaldstr. 39, 48565 Steinfurt, Germany

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 12, 1-17

Abstract: Anaerobic digestion of animal manure is a potential bioenergy resource that avoids greenhouse gas emissions. However, the conventional approach is to use continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) with hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of greater than 30 d. Reactors with biomass retention were investigated in this study in order to increase the efficiency of the digestion process. Filtered pig slurry was used as a substrate in an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor and fixed-bed (FB) reactor. The highest degradation efficiency (η COD ) and methane yield (MY) relative to the chemical oxygen demand (COD) were observed at the minimum loading rates, with MY = 262 L/kg COD and η COD = 73% for the FB reactor and MY = 292 L/kg COD and η COD = 76% for the EGSB reactor. The highest daily methane production rate (MPR) was observed at the maximum loading rate, with MPR = 3.00 m 3 /m 3 /d at HRT = 2 d for the FB reactor and MPR = 2.16 m 3 /m 3 /d at HRT = 3 d for the EGSB reactor. For both reactors, a reduction in HRT was possible compared to conventionally driven CSTRs, with the EGSB reactor offering a higher methane yield and production rate at a shorter HRT.

Keywords: fixed-bed reactor; expanded granular sludge bed reactor; pig slurry; anaerobic digestion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4414/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4414/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4414-:d:841056

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4414-:d:841056