EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparison of Different Topologies of Thermal Management Subsystems in Multi-Stack Fuel Cell Systems

Wei Shen, Lei Fan, Zhirong Pan, Chunguang Chen, Ning Wang and Su Zhou
Additional contact information
Wei Shen: School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Lei Fan: School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Zhirong Pan: Chinesisch-Deutsches Hochschulkolleg, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Chunguang Chen: School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Ning Wang: School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Su Zhou: School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 14, 1-16

Abstract: The performance of a fuel cell stack is affected by the operating temperature of the stack. The thermal management subsystem of a multi-stack fuel cell system (MFCS) is particularly significant for the operating temperature control of each stack in the MFCS. To study the influence of different topologies of a MFCS thermal management subsystem, this paper proposes and establishes two different topologies. Firstly, the integrated topology is proposed. Secondly, seven component models, namely the mixer, thermostat, radiator, tank, pump, bypass value, and proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack temperature models, are described in detail. Finally, the performance of the two topologies of the MFCS thermal management subsystem under two working conditions, steady (200 A) and variable (China heavy-duty commercial test cycle, C-WTVC), is compared. Furthermore, there are two evaluating indicators, including the stability duration and deviation of the operating temperatures of the single stack in the MFCS. Results show that when the MFCS operates under steady working conditions, the integrated topology is superior in operating temperature control accuracy ( Δ T < 0.5 K ), while the distributed topology is superior in the adjustment process ( t ≤ 100 s ). Moreover, when the MFCS operates under variable working conditions, the distributed topology is superior in operating temperature control accuracy.

Keywords: MFCS; thermal management subsystem; operating temperature; topology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5030/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5030/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5030-:d:859448

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5030-:d:859448