EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Quantitative Analysis of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Policies: Perspectives of Policy Content Validity and Carbon Emissions Reduction Effect

Juan Luo, Chong Xu, Boyu Yang, Xiaoyu Chen and Yinyin Wu
Additional contact information
Juan Luo: School of Law, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
Chong Xu: School of Public Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
Boyu Yang: School of Law, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
Xiaoyu Chen: Mathematical & Physical Sciences, Faculty of Arts & Science, St. George Campus, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada
Yinyin Wu: School of Public Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 14, 1-20

Abstract: Carbon emissions trading (CET) is now one of China’s key policy tools for achieving the goals of carbon peak and carbon neutrality. To comprehensively explore the consequences of China’s CET policy, the study first evaluated the content validity of CET policies across China’s 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities falling directly under the central government using policy strengths, tools, and measures from 2011 to 2020. The spatiotemporal drivers of regional carbon efficiency improvements from aspects of actual policy effect, average policy content validity effect, and policy quantity effect were also evaluated via the logarithmic mean Divisia index. This analysis revealed that the policy content validity was increasing in general and was higher in pilot regions. On average, the policy quantity effect was the primary driver of carbon efficiency improvements in both pilot and non-pilot regions, but the actual policy effect failed to promote carbon efficiency in both regions. Beijing’s carbon emissions reduction effect was superior to that of other pilot regions, and where actual policy effect and policy quantity effect were the primary and secondary drivers of local carbon efficiency improvements, respectively. These findings suggest that when formulating CET policies, each region should not only focus on improving policy content validity, but also pay attention to the actual carbon emissions reduction effects produced by policies as well.

Keywords: carbon emissions trading; content validity; carbon reduction; logarithmic mean Divisia index (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5123/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5123/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5123-:d:862721

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5123-:d:862721