Influence of Hydraulic Drivetrain Configuration on Kinematic Discrepancy and Energy Consumption during Obstacle Overcoming in a 6 × 6 All-Wheel Hydraulic Drive Vehicle
Mirosław Przybysz (),
Marian Janusz Łopatka,
Arkadiusz Rubiec,
Piotr Krogul,
Karol Cieślik and
Marcin Małek
Additional contact information
Mirosław Przybysz: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
Marian Janusz Łopatka: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
Arkadiusz Rubiec: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
Piotr Krogul: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
Karol Cieślik: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
Marcin Małek: Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 17, 1-21
Abstract:
One of the problems limiting the off-road mobility of multi-axle-wheeled vehicles is a kinematic discrepancy, which increases the resistance to motion when negotiating obstacles. This paper presents the results of research on the possibility of reducing the kinematic discrepancy in vehicles with a hydrostatic drive for each wheel by the appropriate selection of hydraulic components—hydraulic motors and flow dividers. Four different configurations of the drivetrain were tested. They used slow-running hydraulic orbital motors and multi-piston radial motors, as well as gear and spool flow dividers. The tests were conducted with computer simulations based on tests that had already been performed to identify hydraulic parts. They allowed for the assessment of the influence of the characteristics of the components and the configuration of the drive system on the differentiation of the rotational speeds of individual wheels, slippage between the wheels and the ground, and the developed driving torques while overcoming obstacles. These values directly translate into the kinematic discrepancy of the system, the ability to overcome terrain obstacles, and energy consumption.
Keywords: hydrostatic drivetrains; energy consumption; kinematic discrepancy; terrain mobility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/17/6397/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/17/6397/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6397-:d:904182
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().