Unsteady-State CO 2 Foam Generation and Propagation: Laboratory and Field Insights

Zachary Paul Alcorn (), Aleksandra Sæle, Metin Karakas and Arne Graue
Additional contact information
Zachary Paul Alcorn: Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5009 Bergen, Norway
Aleksandra Sæle: Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5009 Bergen, Norway
Metin Karakas: Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5009 Bergen, Norway
Arne Graue: Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5009 Bergen, Norway

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 18, 1-16

Abstract: This work presents a multiscale experimental and numerical investigation of CO 2 foam generation, strength, and propagation during alternating injection of surfactant solution and CO 2 at reservoir conditions. Evaluations were conducted at the core-scale and with a field-scale radial simulation model representing a CO 2 foam field pilot injection well. The objective of the experimental work was to evaluate foam generation, strength, and propagation during unsteady-state surfactant-alternating-gas (SAG) injection. The SAG injection rapidly generated foam based upon the increased apparent viscosity compared to an identical water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection, without surfactant. The apparent foam viscosity of the SAG continually increased with each subsequent cycle, indicating continued foam generation and propagation into the core. The maximum apparent viscosity of the SAG was 146 cP, whereas the maximum apparent viscosity of the WAG was 2.4 cP. The laboratory methodology captured transient CO 2 foam flow which sheds light on field-scale CO 2 foam flow. The single-injection well radial reservoir simulation model investigated foam generation, strength, and propagation during a recently completed field pilot. The objective was to tune the model to match the observed bottom hole pressure data from the foam pilot and evaluate foam propagation distance. A reasonable match was achieved by reducing the reference mobility reduction factor parameter of the foam model. This suggested that the foam generated during the pilot was not as strong as observed in the laboratory, but it has propagated approximately 400 ft from the injection well, more than halfway to the nearest producer, at the end of pilot injection.

Keywords: foam; CO 2; EOR; multiscale (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6551/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6551/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6551-:d:909442

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().