EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers as Lower Carbon Footprint Alternatives to Portland Cement for Well Cementing Applications

Cameron Horan, Moneeb Genedy, Maria Juenger and Eric van Oort ()
Additional contact information
Cameron Horan: Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
Moneeb Genedy: Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
Maria Juenger: Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
Eric van Oort: Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 23, 1-14

Abstract: Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is currently the preferred material for the creation of barriers in wells during their construction and abandonment globally. OPC, however, is a very carbon-intensive material with some inherent technical weaknesses. These include a low casing-to-cement bond strength which may allow for the formation of micro-annuli, which in turn can become a conduit for greenhouse gas transport (primarily of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas) to surface. Alkali-activated materials (AAMs), also known as geopolymers, have a much lower manufacturing carbon footprint than OPC and can be a good alternative to OPC for primary and remedial well cementing applications. This paper reports on a comprehensive study into the use of Class F fly ash-based geopolymers for a large variety of downhole well conditions, ranging from lower-temperature surface and intermediate casing cementing conditions to much higher temperature conditions (up to 204 °C (400 °F)) that can be encountered in high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) wells and geothermal wells. The rheological and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash with six different sodium and potassium-based hydroxide and silicate activators were measured and compared to OPC. The results show that geopolymer formulation properties can be tuned to a variety of downhole cementing conditions. With the application of a suitable alkaline activator, geopolymers exhibit good compressive and tensile strength and an outstanding casing-to-cement bond strength of up to 8.8 MPa (1283 psi), which is more than an order of magnitude higher than OPC. This has important implications for preventing the creation of micro-annuli as a result of casing-to-cement interface debonding, thereby preventing the potential leakage of methane to the atmosphere on future wells that use geopolymers rather than OPC for barrier creation.

Keywords: geopolymer; fly ash; alkali-activated material; zonal isolation; cement replacement; carbon footprint reduction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/8819/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/8819/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:8819-:d:981026

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:8819-:d:981026