EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Mechanical Stress in Rotors of Permanent Magnet Machines—Comparison of Different Determination Methods

Christian Monissen, Mehmet Emin Arslan, Andreas Krings and Jakob Andert
Additional contact information
Christian Monissen: Teaching and Research Area Mechatronics in Mobile Propulsion, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Forckenbeckstraße 4, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Mehmet Emin Arslan: Teaching and Research Area Mechatronics in Mobile Propulsion, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Forckenbeckstraße 4, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Andreas Krings: FEV Europe GmbH, Neuenhofstr. 181, 52048 Aachen, Germany
Jakob Andert: Teaching and Research Area Mechatronics in Mobile Propulsion, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Forckenbeckstraße 4, 52074 Aachen, Germany

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 23, 1-16

Abstract: In this work, different analytical methods for calculating the mechanical stresses in the rotors of permanent magnet machines are presented. The focus is on interior permanent magnet machines. First, an overview of eight different methods from the literature is given. Specific differences are pointed out, and a brief summary of the analytical approach for each method is provided. For reference purposes, a finite element model is created and simulated for each rotor geometry studied. A total of seven rotors rom representative automotive powertrains are considered in their specific speed range. The analytical methods are used to determine the maximum mechanical stress concentration factors for the seven rotor geometries, in which we are determined to find maximum mechanical stress as a final step of the analytical process. For each geometry and each respective operating speed range, the deviations from the finite element reference are determined. In addition, the error in the selected geometry variations is evaluated. A recommendation for the method with the lowest error considering all cases studied is given specifically for the stress in the airgap bridge and the central bridge.

Keywords: maximum mechanical stress; interior permanent magnet synchronous machine; finite element analysis; high-speed e-machine; stress concentration factor; analytical methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/9169/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/9169/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:9169-:d:992416

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:9169-:d:992416