Periodic CO 2 Injection for Improved Storage Capacity and Pressure Management under Intermittent CO 2 Supply

Anton Shchipanov, Lars Kollbotn, Mauro Encinas, Ingebret Fjelde and Roman Berenblyum
Additional contact information
Anton Shchipanov: Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Professor Olav Hanssens vei 15, 4021 Stavanger, Norway
Lars Kollbotn: Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Professor Olav Hanssens vei 15, 4021 Stavanger, Norway
Mauro Encinas: Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Professor Olav Hanssens vei 15, 4021 Stavanger, Norway
Ingebret Fjelde: Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Professor Olav Hanssens vei 15, 4021 Stavanger, Norway
Roman Berenblyum: Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Professor Olav Hanssens vei 15, 4021 Stavanger, Norway

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 2, 1-20

Abstract: Storing CO 2 in geological formations is an important component of reducing greenhouse gases emissions. The Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) industry is now in its establishing phase, and if successful, massive storage volumes would be needed. It will hence be important to utilize each storage site to its maximum, without challenging the formation integrity. For different reasons, supply of CO 2 to the injection sites may be periodical or unstable, often considered as a risk element reducing the overall efficiency and economics of CCS projects. In this paper we present outcomes of investigations focusing on a variety of positive aspects of periodic CO 2 injection, including pressure management and storage capacity, also highlighting reservoir monitoring opportunities. A feasibility study of periodic injection into an infinite saline aquifer using a mechanistic reservoir model has indicated significant improvement in storage capacity compared to continuous injection. The reservoir pressure and CO 2 plume behavior were further studied revealing a ‘CO 2 expansion squeeze’ effect that governs the improved storage capacity observed in the feasibility study. Finally, the improved pressure measurement and storage capacity by periodic injection was confirmed by field-scale simulations based on a real geological set-up. The field-scale simulations have confirmed that ‘CO 2 expansion squeeze’ governs the positive effect, which is also influenced by well location in the geological structure and aquifer size, while CO 2 dissolution in water showed minor influence. Additional reservoir effects and risks not covered in this paper are then highlighted as a scope for further studies. The value of the periodic injection with intermittent CO 2 supply is finally discussed in the context of deployment and integration of this technology in the establishing CCS industry.

Keywords: CO 2; carbon capture and storage; storage capacity; pressure management; cyclic and periodic injection; intermittent supply; saline aquifer (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/566/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/566/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:566-:d:724070

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().