Multidisciplinary Assessment of a Novel Carbon Capture and Utilization Concept including Underground Sun Conversion

Andreas Zauner, Karin Fazeni-Fraisl, Philipp Wolf-Zoellner, Argjenta Veseli, Marie-Theres Holzleitner, Markus Lehner, Stephan Bauer and Markus Pichler
Additional contact information
Andreas Zauner: Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler, Universität Linz, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria
Karin Fazeni-Fraisl: Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler, Universität Linz, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria
Philipp Wolf-Zoellner: Montanuniversität Leoben, Chair of Process Technology and Industrial Environmental Protection, Franz-Josef-Strasse 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria
Argjenta Veseli: Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler, Universität Linz, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria
Marie-Theres Holzleitner: Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler, Universität Linz, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria
Markus Lehner: Montanuniversität Leoben, Chair of Process Technology and Industrial Environmental Protection, Franz-Josef-Strasse 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria
Stephan Bauer: RAG Austria AG, Schwarzenbergplatz 16, 1015 Vienna, Austria
Markus Pichler: RAG Austria AG, Schwarzenbergplatz 16, 1015 Vienna, Austria

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 3, 1-30

Abstract: The current work investigates the feasibility of a novel Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU) approach—also known as Underground Sun Conversion (USC) or geo-methanation. The overall objective of the current work is a comprehensive assessment on the technical, economic and legal aspects as well as greenhouse gas impacts to be concerned for establishing USC technology concept. This is achieved by applying multidisciplinary research approach combining process simulation, techno-economic and greenhouse gas assessment as well as legal analysis allows answering questions about technical, economic feasibility and greenhouse gas performance as well as on legal constraints related to large scale CCU using geo-methanation in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs. CO 2 from the industry and renewable H 2 from the electrolyser are converted to geomethane in an underground gas storage and used in industry again to close the carbon cycle. Process simulation results showed the conversion rates vary due to operation mode and gas cleaning is necessary in any case to achieve natural gas grid compliant feed in quality. The geomethane production costs are found to be similar or even lower than the costs for synthetic methane from Above Ground Methanation (AGM). The GHG-assessment shows a significant saving compared to fossil natural gas and conventional power-to-gas applications. From a legal perspective the major challenge arises from a regulative gap of CCU in the ETS regime. Accordingly, a far-reaching exemption from the obligation to surrender certificates would be fraught with many legal and technical problems and uncertainties.

Keywords: power-to-gas; geo-methanation; CCU; life cycle assessment; large-scale energy storage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1021/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1021/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1021-:d:738155

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().