Comparative Fuel Yield from Anaerobic Digestion of Emerging Waste in Food and Brewery Systems

Tess Herman, Emily Nungesser, Kimberley E. Miller and Sarah C. Davis
Additional contact information
Tess Herman: Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Service, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA
Emily Nungesser: Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Service, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA
Kimberley E. Miller: Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Service, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA
Sarah C. Davis: Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Service, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 4, 1-13

Abstract: Food waste (FW), a major part of the US waste stream, causes greenhouse gases within landfills, but there is an opportunity to divert FW to anaerobic digestion (AD) facilities that produce biogas and digestate fertilizer. The composition of FW inputs to AD determines the value of these products. This study provides insight into the effect of waste composition on the quality of AD products by first characterizing the biogas and digestate quality of anaerobically digested FW from four diets (paleolithic, ketogenic, vegetarian, and omnivorous), and then estimating the difference in biogas produced from codigested FW and brewery waste (BW). Waste feedstock mixtures were incubated in lab-scale bioreactors for 21 days with live inoculum. Biogas quality was monitored for 21–30 days in four trials. Samples were analyzed using a gas chromatograph for detection of methane (CH 4 ) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). The composition of the waste inputs had a significant impact on the quality of biogas but not on the quality of the digestate, which has implications for the value of post-AD fertilizer products. Wastes with higher proportions of proteins and fats enhanced biogas quality, unlike wastes that were rich in soluble carbohydrates. Codigestion of omnivorous food waste with carbon-rich agricultural wastes (AW) improved biogas quality, but biogas produced from BW does not necessarily improve with increasing amounts of AW in codigestion.

Keywords: anaerobic digestion; methane; paleolithic; ketogenic; Miscanthus × giganteus; codigestion; organic waste; biogas; biodigestion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1538/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1538/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1538-:d:753348

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().