State-of-the-Art Review of Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) Catalyst Regeneration Intensification Technologies

Adefarati Oloruntoba, Yongmin Zhang and Chang Samuel Hsu
Additional contact information
Adefarati Oloruntoba: State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
Yongmin Zhang: State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
Chang Samuel Hsu: State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 6, 1-75

Abstract: Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) is the workhorse of modern crude oil refinery. Its regenerator plays a critical role in optimizing the overall profitability by efficiently restoring the catalyst activity and enhancing the heat balance in the riser reactor. Improvement in the device metallurgy and process operations have enabled industrial regenerators to operate at high temperatures with a better coke burning rate and longer operating cycle. Today, the carbon content of regenerated catalyst has drastically reduced to less than 0.1 wt.%. However, the unit is still plagued with operational complexities and insufficient understanding of the underlying dynamic, multiscale intricacies. Recent process-intensification strategies provide insights into regenerator performance improvement potentials. In this review, the importance of the uniform distribution of spent catalysts through structural modification and operational manipulations of the catalyst distributor is discussed. The knowledge of the role of baffles in enhancing excellent gas–solid interaction has been increasing, but skepticism due to its complex hydrodynamic effects on gas–solid flows fends off operators from its application, a critical evaluation of its implication in the regenerators is covered. The understanding of the contribution of air/steam distributor design and feed gas injection techniques for even contact with spent catalyst leading to the improvement in FCC performance is also investigated. The reliability of FCC components is equally a big concern, as unplanned shutdown and enormous economic losses are being witnessed due to device failure. To this end, mitigation approaches to damaging afterburn and high-temperature erosion problems with respect to process control and geometric adjustment in the bed, freeboard, cyclone separators and collection ducts are explored. Emission limits for fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) and products are consistently ratcheting downward; the commingled turnkey solutions to reducing pollutants generation are also reviewed.

Keywords: afterburn; air/steam distributor; catalyst regeneration; FCCU; maldistribution; regenerator (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2061/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2061/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:6:p:2061-:d:769182

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().