EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Research on the Intake Port of a Uniflow Scavenging GDI Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engine

Tianyou Pei, Feixue Chen, Shuheng Qiu, Dawei Wu, Weiwei Gao, Zhaoping Xu and Chi Zhang
Additional contact information
Tianyou Pei: Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
Feixue Chen: Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
Shuheng Qiu: Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
Dawei Wu: School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
Weiwei Gao: Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
Zhaoping Xu: School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
Chi Zhang: Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 6, 1-15

Abstract: The intake port structure optimization is very important for the uniflow scavenging opposed-piston two-stroke engine, as the intake port structure affects the scavenging efficiency and turbulence kinetic energy and thus further impacts the engine indicated efficiency. This paper aims at improving the indicated efficiency, presenting a comprehensive study on the intake port optimization concerning both scavenging efficiency and turbulence kinetic energy. First, a three-dimensional model based on computational fluids dynamics is established and validated. Subsequently, different numbers of intake ports are compared and analyzed from the perspectives of the scavenging efficiency and turbulence kinetic energy. Furthermore, the double-ports intake structure is selected with the consideration of the compact structure and high scavenging efficiency. Then, the radial angle and width of the double-ports structure are optimized based on the response surface method. The results show that the optimized structure increases the turbulence kinetic energy in relative high scavenging efficiency. The indicated efficiency exhibits a significant increase within the speed range of 1000–4000 rpm and reaches the maximum value of 39.5% around 2000 rpm.

Keywords: opposed-piston engine; two-stroke engine; uniflow scavenging; CFD; in-cylinder airflow (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2148/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2148/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:6:p:2148-:d:771741

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:6:p:2148-:d:771741