EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Processing Studies on Banded Hematite Quartzite’s of Sandur Sciht, Karnataka, India

Aspari Kumara Swamy, Suresh Nikkam and Palthur Sharath Kumar
Additional contact information
Aspari Kumara Swamy: Department of Fuel, Mineral and Metallurgical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad 826004, India
Suresh Nikkam: Department of Fuel, Mineral and Metallurgical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad 826004, India
Palthur Sharath Kumar: Department of Mineral Processing, Vijayanagara Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Ballari 583119, India

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 7, 1-16

Abstract: The greater demand for high-quality iron ores has forced the iron and steel industries to utilize low-grade iron ores, such as banded hematite quartzite (BHQ). In the present work, a striped hematite quartzite sample from the Haraginadoni area, in the Sandur schist belt, Ballari District, Karnataka, India, was subjected to characterization studies and conventional mineral processing methods to produce pellet-grade concentrate, assayed as Fe > 63.0%, SiO 2 + Al 2 O 3 < 7%, (Al 2 O 3 /SiO 2 < 0.5). The sample was analyzed as 35.70% Fe, 47.44% SiO 2 , 0.75% Al 2 O 3 , 0.06% Mn, 0.07% TiO 2 , 0.03% P, 0.02% S, and 0.83% LOI. We focused on two routes of beneficiating BHQ samples: (1) conventional gravity followed by reverse floatation and (2) magnetic separation followed by cleaning of magnetic concentrate by reverse floatation. Route 1, achieved pellet-grade concentrate through assaying, and was 63.73% Fe, 6.20% SiO 2 , 0.19% Al 2 O 3 , 0.03% Al 2 O 3 /SiO 2 , and 0.23% LOI, D 80 45 µm, with 70.1% Fe recovery and 62.8% concentration efficiency at 39.6 wt% yield. Using Route 2, the process consisted of WHIMS at −74 µm, D 80 54 µm, 10,000 Gauss, and with a 3 mm ball matrix, followed by flotation of the WHIMS concentrate, which produced a concentrate through assaying and was 63.34% Fe, 6.30% SiO 2 , 0.20% Al 2 O 3 (0.03 Al 2 O 3 /SiO 2 ), and 0.20% LOI with 77.4% Fe recovery, achieving a 68.8% concentration efficiency at 44.0 wt% yield, meeting pellet-grade specifications. Comparing and analyzing both routes for the concentration methods, Route 2, i.e., WHIMS and the reverse flotation of WHIMS concentrate, was amenable compared to Route 1.

Keywords: iron ore; mineralogy; tabling; liberation; WHIMS; reverse flotation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2542/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2542/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2542-:d:783737

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2542-:d:783737