Evaluation of the Effects of Yielding Rockbolts on Controlling Self-Initiated Strainbursts: A Numerical Study

Jun Wang, Derek B. Apel, Huawei Xu, Chong Wei and Krzysztof Skrzypkowski
Additional contact information
Jun Wang: School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
Derek B. Apel: School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
Huawei Xu: School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
Chong Wei: School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
Krzysztof Skrzypkowski: Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 7, 1-29

Abstract: In this paper, a 2D distinct element method (DEM) model of a deep tunnel in an underground coal mine is built to thoroughly evaluate the effects of yielding (D-bolt and Roofex) and the traditional rockbolt (fully resin-grouted rebar) on controlling self-initiated strainbursts. The occurrence of self-initiated strainbursts is judged based on the stiffness difference between the loading system and rock masses for the first time. The results suggest that the total deformations of the tunnel supported with Roofex and resin-grouted rebar are 1.53 and 2.09 times that of D-bolts (1411 mm). The average velocities of detached rock blocks in the tunnel supported with Roofex and resin-grouted rebar are 3.22 and 3.97 m/s, respectively, which are much higher than that of D-bolts (0.34 m/s). 13 resin-grouted rebar bolts are broken during the strainburst, while D-bolts and Roofex survive. Compared with Roofex (295.16 kJ) and resin-grouted rebar (125.19 kJ), the D-bolt can reduce the most kinetic energy (469.30 kJ). D-bolt and resin-grouted rebar can maintain high axial force levels (214.87 and 151.05 kN) during strainbursts. Both Roofex and resin-grouted rebar fail to control strainbursts. The bolt number significantly influences the control effects of yielding rockbolts on strainbursts. 9 and 12 D-bolts cannot control the strainburst, while 15 and 18 D-bolts can make the tunnel stable. In addition, the detachment and ejection of rocks between rockbolts can be well restrained using surface retain elements, e.g., steel arch. This study highlights the usage of numerical modeling methods in assessing the performance of yielding rockbolts, which can be served as a promising tool to improve and optimize the design of rock supporting in burst-prone grounds.

Keywords: strainburst; local mine stiffness; yielding rockbolt; numerical modeling; distinct element method; underground mining (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2574/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2574/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2574-:d:785175

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().