EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Optimal Scheduling of Energy Storage System Considering Life-Cycle Degradation Cost Using Reinforcement Learning

Wonpoong Lee, Myeongseok Chae and Dongjun Won
Additional contact information
Wonpoong Lee: KEPCO Management Research Institute (KEMRI), Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO), 55, Jeollyeok-ro, Naju 58277, Korea
Myeongseok Chae: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Inha University, 100, Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea
Dongjun Won: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Inha University, 100, Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 8, 1-19

Abstract: Recently, due to the ever-increasing global warming effect, the proportion of renewable energy sources in the electric power industry has increased significantly. With the increase in distributed power sources with adjustable outputs, such as energy storage systems (ESSs), it is necessary to define ESS usage standards for an adaptive power transaction plan. However, the life-cycle cost is generally defined in a quadratic formula without considering various factors. In this study, the life-cycle cost for an ESS is defined in detail based on a life assessment model and used for scheduling. The life-cycle cost is affected by four factors: temperature, average state-of-charge (SOC), depth-of-discharge (DOD), and time. In the case of the DOD stress model, the life-cycle cost is expressed as a function of the cycle depth, whose exact value can be determined based on fatigue analysis techniques such as the Rainflow counting algorithm. The optimal scheduling of the ESS is constructed considering the life-cycle cost using a tool based on reinforcement learning. Since the life assessment cannot apply the analytical technique due to the temperature characteristics and time-dependent characteristics of the ESS SOC, the reinforcement learning that derives optimal scheduling is used. The results show that the SOC curve changes with respect to weight. As the weight of life-cycle cost increases, the ESS output and charge/discharge frequency decrease.

Keywords: energy storage system; life-cycle cost; optimal scheduling; reinforcement learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/8/2795/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/8/2795/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:2795-:d:791330

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:2795-:d:791330