EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Utilization of a Commercial 3D Printer for the Construction of a Bio-Hybrid Device Based on Bioink and Adult Human Mesenchymal Cells

Giulio Morelli, Teresa Pescara, Alessia Greco, Pia Montanucci, Giuseppe Basta, Federico Rossi, Riccardo Calafiore and Alberto Maria Gambelli ()
Additional contact information
Giulio Morelli: Engineering Department, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 93, 06125 Perugia, Italy
Teresa Pescara: Section of Internal Medicine and Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences (MISEM), Laboratory for Endocrine Cell Transplants and Biohybrid Organs, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Piazzale Gambuli, 06132 Perugia, Italy
Alessia Greco: Section of Internal Medicine and Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences (MISEM), Laboratory for Endocrine Cell Transplants and Biohybrid Organs, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Piazzale Gambuli, 06132 Perugia, Italy
Pia Montanucci: Section of Internal Medicine and Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences (MISEM), Laboratory for Endocrine Cell Transplants and Biohybrid Organs, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Piazzale Gambuli, 06132 Perugia, Italy
Giuseppe Basta: Section of Internal Medicine and Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences (MISEM), Laboratory for Endocrine Cell Transplants and Biohybrid Organs, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Piazzale Gambuli, 06132 Perugia, Italy
Federico Rossi: Engineering Department, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 93, 06125 Perugia, Italy
Riccardo Calafiore: Section of Internal Medicine and Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences (MISEM), Laboratory for Endocrine Cell Transplants and Biohybrid Organs, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Piazzale Gambuli, 06132 Perugia, Italy
Alberto Maria Gambelli: Engineering Department, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 93, 06125 Perugia, Italy

Energies, 2022, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-15

Abstract: The biofabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds using 3D printers and cell-containing bioinks is very promising. A wide range of materials and bioink compositions are being created and tested for cell viability and printability in order to satisfy the requirements of a bioink. This methodology has not still achieved technological maturity, and the actual costs mean that they are often inaccessible for researchers, consequently lowering the development and extending the required times. This research aims to apply this methodology on a laboratory scale by re-adapting a commercial 3D printer, consequently lowering the costs and energy impacts, and, at the same time, ensuring a level of accuracy extremely close to the currently adopted devices and, more in general, suitable for the scopes of the research. To accomplish this, we assembled a biomimetic scaffold made of human Umbilical Cord Matrix Stem Cells (hUCMS), cellulose, and alginate. Various molds were used to produce 3D scaffolds of different sizes. After bioprinting, cell viability was analyzed using ethidium bromide and fluorescein diacetate, and a histological stain was used to evaluate cell and bioink morphology. All of the examined bioinks had a uniform final 3D structure and were stable, easily printable, and procedure-adapted. Up until 21 days of culture, the bioinks remained unaltered and were simple to manipulate. After 7 and 21 days of cell culture, the hUCMS in the cellulose/alginate-based bioinks exhibited cell viabilities of 95% and 85%, respectively. The cells did not present with a fibroblast-like shape but appeared to be round-shaped and homogeneously distributed in the 3D structure. Biomimetic bioink, which is based on cellulose and alginate, is an appropriate hydrogel for 3D bioprinting. This preliminary work illustrated the potential use of these two biomaterials for the 3D bioprinting of mesenchymal stem cells.

Keywords: 3D printer; cost and energy savings; printing setup; human mesenchymal stem cells; biomaterials; cellulose; alginate (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/374/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/374/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:374-:d:1018527

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:374-:d:1018527