EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of Slag Foaming Behavior Using Renewable Carbon Sources in Electric Arc Furnace-Based Steel Production

Lina Kieush (), Johannes Schenk, Andrii Koveria, Andrii Hrubiak, Horst Hopfinger and Heng Zheng
Additional contact information
Lina Kieush: Chair of Ferrous Metallurgy, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria
Johannes Schenk: Chair of Ferrous Metallurgy, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria
Andrii Koveria: Department of Chemistry, Dnipro University of Technology, 49005 Dnipro, Ukraine
Andrii Hrubiak: G.V. Kurdyumov Institute for Metal Physics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 02000 Kyiv, Ukraine
Horst Hopfinger: Chair of Ceramics, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria
Heng Zheng: Chair of Ferrous Metallurgy, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria

Energies, 2023, vol. 16, issue 12, 1-25

Abstract: The influence of different carbon sources, including anthracite, calcined petroleum coke, three samples of high-temperature coke, biochar, and a mixture of 50 wt.% biochar and 50 wt.% coke, on slag foaming behavior was studied. The slag’s composition was set to FeO-CaO-Al 2 O 3 -MgO-SiO 2 , and the temperature for slag foaming was 1600 °C. The effect of the carbon sources was evaluated using foaming characteristics (foam height, foam volume, relative foaming height, and gas fraction), X-ray diffraction (XRD), chemical analysis of the slag foams, Mossbauer spectroscopy, observation by scanning electron microscope (SEM), and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping. Different foaming phenomena were found among conventional sources, biochar as a single source, and the mixture of coke and biochar. Biochar showed the most inferior foaming characteristics compared to the other studied carbon sources. Nevertheless, the slag foaming process was improved and showed slag foaming characteristics similar to results obtained using conventional carbon sources when the mixture of 50 wt.% coke and 50 wt.% biochar was used. The XRD analysis revealed a difference between the top and bottom of the slag foams. In almost all cases, a maghemite crystalline phase was detected at the top of the slag foams, indicating oxidation; metallic iron was found at the bottom. Furthermore, a difference in the slag foam (mixture of coke and biochar) was found in the presence of such crystalline phases as magnesium iron oxide (Fe 2 MgO 4 ) and magnetite (Mg 0 . 4 Fe 2 . 96 O 4 ). Notwithstanding the carbon source applied, a layer between the foam slag and the crucible wall was found in many samples. Based on the SEM/EDS and XRD results, it was assumed this layer consists of gehlenite (Ca 2 (Al(AlSi)O 7 ) and two spinels: magnesium aluminate (MgAl 2 O 4 ) and magnesium iron oxide (Fe 2 MgO 4 ).

Keywords: electric arc furnace; slag foaming; carbon sources; biochar; steelmaking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4673/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4673/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:12:p:4673-:d:1169569

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:12:p:4673-:d:1169569