EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Optimal Parameter Identification of a PEM Fuel Cell Using Recent Optimization Algorithms

Hegazy Rezk, Tabbi Wilberforce (), A. G. Olabi, Rania M. Ghoniem, Enas Taha Sayed and Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem
Additional contact information
Hegazy Rezk: Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering in Wadi Alddawasir, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
Tabbi Wilberforce: Mechanical Engineering and Design, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
A. G. Olabi: Sustainable Energy & Power Systems Research Centre, RISE, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
Rania M. Ghoniem: Department of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
Enas Taha Sayed: Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Minia 2431436, Egypt
Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem: Sustainable Energy & Power Systems Research Centre, RISE, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates

Energies, 2023, vol. 16, issue 14, 1-20

Abstract: The parameter identification of a PEMFC is the process of using optimization algorithms to determine the ideal unknown variables suitable for the development of an accurate fuel-cell-performance prediction model. These parameters are not always available from the manufacturer’s datasheet, so they need to be determined to accurately model and predict the fuel cell’s performance. Five optimization methods—bald eagle search (BES) algorithm, equilibrium optimizer (EO), coot (COOT) algorithm, antlion optimizer (ALO), and heap-based optimizer (HBO)—are used to compute seven unknown parameters of a PEMFC. During optimization, these seven parameters are used as decision variables, and the fitness function to be minimized is the sum square error (SSE) between the estimated cell voltage and the actual measured cell voltage. The SSE obtained for the BES algorithm was noted to be 0.035102. The COOT algorithm recorded an SSE of 0.04155, followed by ALO with an SSE of 0.04022 and HBO with an SSE of 0.056021. BES predicted the performance of the fuel cell accurately; hence, it is suitable for the development of a digital twin for fuel-cell applications and control systems for the automotive industry. Furthermore, it was deduced that the convergence speed for BES was faster compared to the other algorithms investigated. This study aims to use metaheuristic algorithms to predict fuel-cell performance for the development and commercialization of digital twins in the automotive industry.

Keywords: PEM fuel cell; optimization; parameter identification; modeling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5246/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5246/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5246-:d:1189675

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5246-:d:1189675