EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Opportunities to Improve Marine Power Cable Ratings with Ocean Bottom Temperature Models

Jon Duell (), Justin Dix, George Callender, Tim Henstock and Hannah Porter
Additional contact information
Jon Duell: School of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
Justin Dix: School of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
George Callender: Tony Davies High Voltage Laboratory, School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Tim Henstock: School of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
Hannah Porter: Ocean Infinity, Unit 1 Keel Rd., Woolston, Southampton SO19 9UY, UK

Energies, 2023, vol. 16, issue 14, 1-20

Abstract: Determining reliable cable ampacities for marine High Voltage Cables is currently the subject of significant industry and academic reassessment in order to optimize (maximizing load while maintaining safe operating temperatures) design and reduce costs. Ampacity models can be elaborate, and inaccuracies are increasingly predicated on the uncertainty in environmental inputs. A stark example is the role of ambient temperature at cable depth, which, due to the scale of cables and the inaccessibility of the seafloor, is commonly estimated at 15 °C. Oceanographic models incorporating ocean bottom temperature are increasingly available, and they achieve coverage and spatiotemporal resolutions for cable applications without the requirement for project specific measurements. Here, a rudimental validation of the AMM15 and AMM7 mean monthly ocean bottom temperature models for the NW European Shelf indicates encouraging accuracies (MBE ≤ 1.48 °C; RMSE ≤ 2.2 °C). A series of cable case studies are used to demonstrate that cable ratings can change between −4.1% and +7.8% relative to ratings based on a common static (15 °C) ambient temperature value. Consideration of such variations can result in both significant ratings (and hence capital expenditure and operating costs) gains and/or the avoidance of cable overheating. Consequently, validated modelled ocean bottom temperatures are deemed sufficiently accurate, providing incomparable coverage and spatiotemporal resolutions of the whole annual temperature signal, thereby facilitating much more robust ambient temperatures and drastically improving ampacity estimates.

Keywords: marine power cables; thermal design parameters; ambient ocean bottom temperature; levelized cost of electricity; thermal degradation; validation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5454/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5454/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5454-:d:1196507

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5454-:d:1196507