Cleaner Cooking with Charcoal in Kibera Informal Settlement in Nairobi, Kenya, and Its Implications for Livelihoods and the Environment

Moses Kirimi (), James K. Gitau, Ruth Mendum, Catherine Muthuri and Mary Njenga
Additional contact information
Moses Kirimi: Centre for International Forestry Research-World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Nairobi P.O. Box 30677-00100, Kenya
James K. Gitau: Centre for International Forestry Research-World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Nairobi P.O. Box 30677-00100, Kenya
Ruth Mendum: Ag Sciences Global, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, Agricultural Administration Building, University Park, State College, PA 16802, USA
Catherine Muthuri: Centre for International Forestry Research-World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Nairobi P.O. Box 30677-00100, Kenya
Mary Njenga: Centre for International Forestry Research-World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Nairobi P.O. Box 30677-00100, Kenya

Energies, 2023, vol. 16, issue 19, 1-17

Abstract: Woodfuel that is unsustainably sourced and inefficiently used results in negative environmental and health impacts. This study assessed charcoal use and resultant concentrations of indoor air pollutants (IAP) in an urban informal settlement while cooking with a Jikokoa stove (an improved branded charcoal stove) and medium and small-sized artisanal Kenya Ceramic Jikos (KCJs). Fuel stacking was prevalent with charcoal and kerosene being used by 25% of the studied households. Cooking with a Jikokoa stove reduced charcoal consumption by 6.4% and 26% compared to small and medium-sized KCJs, respectively. The small-sized KCJ reduced charcoal consumption by 21% compared to the medium-sized KCJ. The Jikokoa stove reduced concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO) by 10% and 50% and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) by 6% and 77% compared to small-sized and medium-sized KCJs, respectively. The Jikokoa stove reduced carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentrations by 15.6% compared to the medium-sized KCJ. The small-sized KCJ reduced CO and PM 2.5 concentrations by 45% and 75%, respectively, compared to the medium-sized KCJ. In summary, small-sized KCJs are more effective than medium-sized ones, and Jikokoa stoves more effective than small-sized KCJs, making it the stove of choice. The more efficient charcoal stoves are, the more charcoal consumption and IAP can be reduced, mitigating environmental degradation, climate change and health problems associated with smoke in the kitchen. There is need for participatory research to scale improved stoves and upgrade local practices as they are cheaper and already embedded in the cooking culture.

Keywords: cooking energy mix; charcoal stove; indoor air pollution; woodfuel use; climate change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/19/6808/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/19/6808/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:19:p:6808-:d:1247532

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().