Assessment of Co-Gasification Methods for Hydrogen Production from Biomass and Plastic Wastes

Jonah M. Williams () and A. C. (Thanos) Bourtsalas ()
Additional contact information
Jonah M. Williams: Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
A. C. (Thanos) Bourtsalas: Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA

Energies, 2023, vol. 16, issue 22, 1-18

Abstract: In recent decades, economic development and population growth has been accompanied by the generation of billions of tonnes of solid residues or municipal “wastes”, a substantial portion of which is composed of plastics and biomass materials. Combustion-based waste-to-energy is a viable and mature method of extracting calorific value from these end-of-life post-recyclable materials that are otherwise landfilled. However, alternative thermochemical methods, such as gasification, are becoming attractive due to the ability to synthesize chemical precursors for supply chain recirculation. Due to the infancy of gasification technology deployment, especially in the context of anthropogenic CO 2 emission reduction, additional systems engineering studies are necessary. Herein, we conduct an attributional life cycle analysis to elucidate the syngas production and environmental impacts of advanced thermochemical gasification methods for the treatment of biomass and plastic wastes obtained from municipal solid wastes, using a comprehensive thermodynamic process model constructed in AspenTech. Feedstock composition, process parameters, and gasification methods are varied to study the effects on syngas quality, yield, power generation potential, and overall greenhouse gas emissions. Steam-based gasification presents up to 38% reductions in CO 2 emissions when compared to conventional thermochemical methods. Using gasifier-active materials, such as metal hydroxides, can also further reduce CO 2 emissions, and realizes a capture load of 1.75 tonnes of CO 2 per tonne of plastic/stover feedstock. This design alteration has implications for reductions in CAPEX due to the mode of CO 2 capture utilized (e.g., solid sorbent vs. liquid SELEXOL). The use of renewable energy to provide a method to generate steam for this process could make the environmental impact of such MSW gasification processes lower by between 60–75% tonnes of CO 2 per tonne of H 2 . Overall, these results can be used to inform the guidance of advanced waste gasification methods as a low-carbon transition towards a circular economy.

Keywords: municipal waste treatment; hydrogen production; gasification; carbon capture utilization and storage; thermochemical conversion; plastic pollution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7548/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7548/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7548-:d:1278913

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().