Assessment of Irregular Biomass Particles Fluidization in Bubbling Fluidized Beds

David Bannon, Mirka Deza, Masoud Masoumi and Bahareh Estejab ()
Additional contact information
David Bannon: Mechanical Engineering Department, Manhattan College, The Bronx, NY 10471, USA
Mirka Deza: Mechanical Engineering Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
Masoud Masoumi: Mechanical Engineering Department, Manhattan College, The Bronx, NY 10471, USA
Bahareh Estejab: Mechanical Engineering Department, Manhattan College, The Bronx, NY 10471, USA

Energies, 2023, vol. 16, issue 4, 1-20

Abstract: Biomass as a clean and renewable source of energy has immense potential to aid in solving the energy crisis in the world. In order to accurately predict the fluidization behavior of biomass particles using the Eulerian–Eulerian approach and the kinetic theory for granular flows (KTGF), employing appropriate models that adapt to irregularly shaped particles and can precisely predict the interaction between particles is crucial. In this study, the effects of varying radial distribution functions (RDF), frictional viscosity models (FVM), angles of internal friction ( ϕ ), and stress blending functions (SBF) on the performance of two-fluid models (TFM) were investigated. Simulation predictions were compared and validated with the previous experiments in the literature on Geldart B biomass particles of walnut shells. When applying sphericity to account for size irregularities of biomass particles, the results of this study demonstrated that predictions of both the Ma–Ahmadi and the Carnahan–Starling RDFs along with the Schaeffer FVM agree with experimental data. More specifically, the bubbling behavior prediction slightly favored the use of the Ma–Ahmadi RDF for biomass particles. The results also revealed the importance of using FVM regardless of the initial void fraction. The use of the Schaeffer FVM became more important as time proceeded and particle bulk density decreased. With the change of ϕ and the application of SBF, no significant differences in the time-averaged results were observed. However, when ϕ ranges were between 30 and 40, the predictions of bubbling behavior became more greatly aligned with experimental results.

Keywords: fluidized bed; Eulerian–Eulerian model; two-fluid model; kinetic theory for granular flow; biomass (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/2051/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/2051/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:2051-:d:1073697

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().