Method Selection for Analyzing the Mesopore Structure of Shale—Using a Combination of Multifractal Theory and Low-Pressure Gas Adsorption
Meng Wang,
Zhuo Li (),
Zhikai Liang (),
Zhenxue Jiang and
Wei Wu
Additional contact information
Meng Wang: State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
Zhuo Li: State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
Zhikai Liang: State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
Zhenxue Jiang: State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
Wei Wu: Shale Gas Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610056, China
Energies, 2023, vol. 16, issue 5, 1-27
Abstract:
Nitrogen adsorption experiments have been extensively applied to shale pore structure research and evaluation. The pore structure can be quantitatively characterized in accordance with the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm using various calculation models, whereas the results obtained using different models can more effectively indicate the pore characteristics of shale remains unclear. Further, there has not been any unified process in the optimization of calculation models for pore size distribution (PSD). In this study, the Barret–Joyner–Halenda adsorption (BJH-AD) and BJH desorption (BJH-DE) models were used with Longmaxi Formation shale as an example. Subsequently, the density functional theory (DFT) calculations were conducted on different shale lithofacies samples. Next, the pore structure parameters and heterogeneity obtained using different models were compared, and the consistency parameters of different models were obtained in accordance with Cronbach’s alpha. The results indicated that the pore structure parameters obtained using the BJH-AD model were underestimated since the macroscopic thermodynamic theory was not applicable to this study. The DFT model showed multiple peaks in the range of 1–10 nm, whereas the BJH-DE model had a significant artificial peak in the range of 3.8 nm due to the tensile strength effect, thus suggesting that the DFT model is more capable of characterizing the pores with a pore size 10 nm lower than the BJH model. The PSD curves generated using the three models exhibited multifractal characteristics, whereas the results of the heterogeneity achieved using different models were different. Moreover, the consistency of the results of different models can be studied in depth by combining Cronbach’s alpha with various heterogeneity parameters. The DFT model exhibited high consistency in pore structure parameters and pore heterogeneity, thus suggesting that the DFT method of N 2 is the optimal physical adsorption data analysis method in the shale mesoporous range. Accordingly, the nitrogen adsorption curve, the hysteresis loop shape, multifractal parameters, and Cronbach’s alpha were integrated to generate a working flow chart of the nitrogen adsorption model for N 2 -adsorption-model optimization.
Keywords: shale; pore structure; N 2 adsorption; multifractal; pore structure; Cronbach’s alpha (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2464/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2464/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2464-:d:1088036
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().