Comparison of the Power Extraction Performance of an Oscillating Hydrofoil Turbine with Different Deflector Designs

Arun Raj Shanmugam, Ki Sun Park and Chang Hyun Sohn ()
Additional contact information
Arun Raj Shanmugam: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Ki Sun Park: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Chang Hyun Sohn: School of Mechanical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea

Energies, 2023, vol. 16, issue 8, 1-29

Abstract: The unsteady RANS equations for a two-dimensional hydrofoil were solved using ANSYS Fluent to model and simulate the hydrofoil at a constant Reynolds number, Re , of 2 × 10 5 and a fixed reduced frequency, f *, of 0.14. The simulations were performed by varying parameters, such as the number of deflectors N , tilt angle of the deflectors β , and vertical spacing of the deflectors J * = J / c , to determine the effect of the upstream deflector’s position on the hydrofoil’s performance. The results demonstrated that the deflector was effective at redirecting the separated flow away from the edges, which was then amplified downstream before colliding with the leading edge of the oscillating hydrofoil to increase power extraction. The performance of the oscillating hydrofoil was highly reliant on all three studied parameters. The hydrofoil with two deflectors ( N = 2) displayed marginally superior power extraction capability compared to the hydrofoil with a single deflector ( N = 1). Furthermore, the hydrofoil with the rightward inclined deflector at a low tilt angle (−5° ≥ β ≥ −10°) exhibited relatively better power extraction performance than the others. The best deflector design increased the hydrofoil’s cycle-averaged power coefficient by approximately 32% compared to a hydrofoil without a deflector. The vortex structures revealed that the flow evolution and power extraction performance were dependent on the size, robustness, and growth rate of the leading edge vortex (LEV) as well as the timing of LEV separation. The power extraction efficiency of an oscillating hydrofoil increased in the mid downstroke and upstroke due to the formation of a more robust LEV when the hydrofoil–deflector interaction was advantageous, but it dropped in the wing reversal due to the early separation of the LEV when the hydrofoil–deflector interaction was counterproductive.

Keywords: deflector; flapping wing; FSI; oscillating wing; tidal turbine; renewable energy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3420/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3420/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3420-:d:1122651

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().