EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Research Progress of Battery Life Prediction Methods Based on Physical Model

Xingxing Wang, Peilin Ye, Shengren Liu, Yu Zhu (), Yelin Deng (), Yinnan Yuan and Hongjun Ni ()
Additional contact information
Xingxing Wang: School of Mechanical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
Peilin Ye: School of Mechanical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
Shengren Liu: School of Mechanical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
Yu Zhu: School of Mechanical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
Yelin Deng: School of Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou 215131, China
Yinnan Yuan: School of Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou 215131, China
Hongjun Ni: School of Zhang Jian, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China

Energies, 2023, vol. 16, issue 9, 1-20

Abstract: Remaining useful life prediction is of great significance for battery safety and maintenance. The remaining useful life prediction method, based on a physical model, has wide applicability and high prediction accuracy, which is the research hotspot of the next generation battery life prediction method. In this study, the prediction methods of battery life were compared and analyzed, and the prediction methods based on the physical model were summarized. The prediction methods were classified according to their different characteristics including the electrochemical model, equivalent circuit model, and empirical model. By analyzing the emphasis of electrochemical process simplification, different electrochemical models were classified including the P2D model, SP model, and electrochemical fusion model. The equivalent circuit model was divided into the Rint model, Thevenin model, PNGV model, and RC model for the change of electronic components in the model. According to the different mathematical expressions of constructing the empirical model, it can be divided into the exponential model, polynomial model, exponential and polynomial mixed model, and capacity degradation model. Through the collocation of different filtering methods, the different efficiency of the models is described in detail. The research progress of various prediction methods as well as the changes and characteristics of traditional models were compared and analyzed, and the future development of battery life prediction methods was prospected.

Keywords: lithium-ion battery; residual life; physical model; prediction method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/9/3858/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/9/3858/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:3858-:d:1137619

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:3858-:d:1137619