Power Transformer Fault Detection: A Comparison of Standard Machine Learning and autoML Approaches

Guillermo Santamaria-Bonfil, Gustavo Arroyo-Figueroa (), Miguel A. Zuniga-Garcia, Carlos Gustavo Azcarraga Ramos and Ali Bassam
Additional contact information
Guillermo Santamaria-Bonfil: Data Portfolio Manager Department, BBVA Mexico, Mexico City 06600, Mexico
Gustavo Arroyo-Figueroa: Instituto Nacional de Electricidad y Energias Limpias, Cuernavaca 62490, Mexico
Miguel A. Zuniga-Garcia: PCI Energy Solutions, Norman, OK 73072, USA
Carlos Gustavo Azcarraga Ramos: Instituto Nacional de Electricidad y Energias Limpias, Cuernavaca 62490, Mexico
Ali Bassam: Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Merida 97000, Mexico

Energies, 2023, vol. 17, issue 1, 1-22

Abstract: A key component for the performance, availability, and reliability of power grids is the power transformer. Although power transformers are very reliable assets, the early detection of incipient degradation mechanisms is very important to preventing failures that may shorten their residual life. In this work, a comparative analysis of standard machine learning (ML) algorithms (such as single and ensemble classification algorithms) and automatic machine learning (autoML) classifiers is presented for the fault diagnosis of power transformers. The goal of this research is to determine whether fully automated ML approaches are better or worse than traditional ML frameworks that require a human in the loop (such as a data scientist) to identify transformer faults from dissolved gas analysis results. The methodology uses a transformer fault database (TDB) gathered from specialized databases and technical literature. Fault data were processed using the Duval pentagon diagnosis approach and user–expert knowledge. Parameters from both single and ensemble classifiers were optimized through standard machine learning procedures. The results showed that the best-suited algorithm to tackle the problem is a robust, automatic machine learning classifier model, followed by standard algorithms, such as neural networks and stacking ensembles. These results highlight the ability of a robust, automatic machine learning model to handle unbalanced power transformer fault datasets with high accuracy, requiring minimum tuning effort by electrical experts. We also emphasize that identifying the most probable transformer fault condition will reduce the time required to find and solve a fault.

Keywords: transformer fault diagnosis; machine learning; automatic machine learning; power systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/77/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/77/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:77-:d:1305583

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().