A Comparative Analysis of Distributor and Rotor Single Regulation Strategies for Low Head Mini Hydraulic Turbines

Dario Barsi, Francesca Satta, Marina Ubaldi and Pietro Zunino ()
Additional contact information
Dario Barsi: Department of Mechanical, Energy, Management and Transportation Engineering, University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy
Francesca Satta: Department of Mechanical, Energy, Management and Transportation Engineering, University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy
Marina Ubaldi: Department of Mechanical, Energy, Management and Transportation Engineering, University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy
Pietro Zunino: Department of Mechanical, Energy, Management and Transportation Engineering, University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 10, 1-24

Abstract: Tubular axial turbines (TATs) play a crucial role in mini and micro hydropower setups that require simplified yet reliable solutions. In very low head scenarios, single regulation in TATs is common, due to economic impracticality of the sophisticated mechanisms involved in the conjugate distributor–rotor regulation typical of the Kaplan turbines. Distributor or rotor single regulation strategies offer operation flexibility, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages. Stator regulation is simpler, while rotor regulation is more complex but offers potential efficiency gains. The present paper analyzes energy losses associated with these regulation strategies using two approaches: 1D mean line turbomachinery equations and 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The 1D mean line approach is used for understanding the conceptual fluid dynamic aspects involved in the two different regulation approaches, thereby identifying the loss-generation mechanisms in off-design operation. Fully 3D CFD simulations allow for quantifying and deeply explaining the differences in the hydraulic efficiencies of the two regulation strategies. Attention is focused on the two main loss contributions: residual tangential kinetic energy at the rotor outlet and entropy generation. Rotor regulation, even if more complex, provides better results than distributor regulation in terms of both effectiveness (larger flow rate sensitivity to stagger angle variation) and turbine operating efficiency (lower off-design losses).

Keywords: renewable energy conversion; hydraulic turbines; low head hydraulic energy; CFD calculation; regulation strategies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/10/2304/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/10/2304/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:10:p:2304-:d:1392024

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().