Optimization of Renewable Energy Hydrogen Production Systems Using Volatility Improved Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Algorithm
Hui Wang,
Xiaowen Chen,
Qianpeng Yang,
Bowen Li (),
Zongyu Yue (),
Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah,
Haifeng Liu and
Mingfa Yao
Additional contact information
Hui Wang: Qinghai Yellow River Upstream Hydropower Development Co., Ltd., Photovoltaic Industry Technology Branch, Xining 810007, China
Xiaowen Chen: Qinghai Yellow River Upstream Hydropower Development Co., Ltd., Photovoltaic Industry Technology Branch, Xining 810007, China
Qianpeng Yang: Qinghai Yellow River Upstream Hydropower Development Co., Ltd., Photovoltaic Industry Technology Branch, Xining 810007, China
Bowen Li: State Key Laboratory of Combustion Science for Internal Combustion Engines, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Zongyu Yue: State Key Laboratory of Combustion Science for Internal Combustion Engines, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah: State Key Laboratory of Combustion Science for Internal Combustion Engines, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Haifeng Liu: State Key Laboratory of Combustion Science for Internal Combustion Engines, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Mingfa Yao: State Key Laboratory of Combustion Science for Internal Combustion Engines, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 10, 1-15
Abstract:
Optimizing the energy structure to effectively enhance the integration level of renewable energy is an important pathway for achieving dual carbon goals. This study utilizes an improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on load fluctuation rates to optimize the architecture and unit capacity of hydrogen production systems. It investigates the optimal configuration methods for the architectural model of new energy hydrogen production systems in Xining City, Qinghai Province, as well as the internal storage battery, ALK hydrogen production equipment, and PEM hydrogen production equipment, aiming at various scenarios of power sources such as wind, solar, wind–solar complementary, and wind–solar–storage complementary, as well as intermittent hydrogen production scenarios such as hydrogen stations, hydrogen metallurgy, and continuous hydrogen production scenarios such as hydrogen methanol production. The results indicate that the fluctuation of hydrogen load scenarios has a significant impact on the installed capacity and initial investment of the system. Compared with the single-channel photovoltaic hydrogen production scheme, the dual-channel hydrogen production scheme still reduces equipment capacity by 6.04% and initial investment by 6.16% in the chemical hydrogen scenario with the least load fluctuation.
Keywords: wind–solar coupling; hybrid hydrogen production; fluctuation characteristics; improved algorithm (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/10/2384/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/10/2384/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:10:p:2384-:d:1395229
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().