Energy Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery Using Supercritical CO 2 Brayton Cycle for Series Hybrid Electric Vehicles
Gabriel Mocanu,
Cristian Iosifescu,
Ion V. Ion (),
Florin Popescu,
Michael Frătița and
Robert Mădălin Chivu
Additional contact information
Gabriel Mocanu: Thermal System and Automotive Department, “Dunărea de Jos” Universitaty of Galați, 800008 Galati, Romania
Cristian Iosifescu: Thermal System and Automotive Department, “Dunărea de Jos” Universitaty of Galați, 800008 Galati, Romania
Ion V. Ion: Thermal System and Automotive Department, “Dunărea de Jos” Universitaty of Galați, 800008 Galati, Romania
Florin Popescu: Thermal System and Automotive Department, “Dunărea de Jos” Universitaty of Galați, 800008 Galati, Romania
Michael Frătița: Thermal System and Automotive Department, “Dunărea de Jos” Universitaty of Galați, 800008 Galati, Romania
Robert Mădălin Chivu: Thermal System and Automotive Department, “Dunărea de Jos” Universitaty of Galați, 800008 Galati, Romania
Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 11, 1-17
Abstract:
Waste heat recovery from exhaust gas is one of the most convenient methods to save energy in internal combustion engine-driven vehicles. This paper aims to investigate a reduction in waste heat from the exhaust gas of an internal combustion engine of a serial Diesel–electric hybrid bus by recovering part of the heat and converting it into useful power with the help of a split-flow supercritical CO 2 (sCO 2 ) recompression Brayton cycle. It can recover 17.01 kW of the total 33.47 kW of waste heat contained in exhaust gas from a 151 kW internal combustion engine. The thermal efficiency of the cycle is 38.51%, and the net power of the cycle is 6.55 kW. The variation in the sCO 2 temperature at the shutdown of the internal combustion engine is analyzed, and a slow drop followed by a sudden and then a slow drop is observed. After 80 s from stopping the engine, the temperature drops by (23–33)% depending on the tube thickness of the recovery heat exchanger. The performances (net power, thermal efficiency, and waste heat recovery efficiency) of the split-flow sCO 2 recompression Brayton cycle are clearly superior to those of the steam Rankine cycle and the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) with cyclopentane as a working fluid.
Keywords: internal combustion engine; waste heat; supercritical CO 2 recompression Brayton cycle; heat recovery (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2494/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2494/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:2494-:d:1399634
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().