Impact of Geometrical Misplacement of Heat Exchanger Pipe Parallel Configuration in Energy Piles
Qusi I. Alqawasmeh,
Guillermo A. Narsilio (narsilio@unimelb.edu.au) and
Nikolas Makasis
Additional contact information
Qusi I. Alqawasmeh: Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Guillermo A. Narsilio: Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Nikolas Makasis: School of Sustainability, Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 11, 1-25
Abstract:
Shallow geothermal or ground source heat pump (GSHP) energy systems offer efficient space heating and cooling, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and electrical consumption. Incorporating ground heat exchangers (GHEs) within pile foundations, as part of these GSHP systems, has gained significant attention as it can reduce capital costs. The design and optimisation of GHEs connected in parallel within energy piles have been researched widely, considering symmetrical placement, while the potential misplacement due to construction errors and the optimal placement remain mostly unexplored. This study utilises 3D finite element numerical methods, analysing energy piles with diameters from 0.5 m to 1.4 m, equipped with parallelly connected U-tube and W-tube GHEs. The impact of GHE loop placement is analysed, considering the influence of the ground and concrete thermal conductivities, pile length, fluid flow rate, GHE pipe diameter, and pile spacing. Results indicate a marginal impact, less than 3%, on the overall heat transfer when loops deviate from symmetry and less than 5% on the total heat transfer shared by each loop, except for highly non-symmetric configurations. Symmetrical and evenly spaced loop placement generally maintains favourable thermal performance and ease of installation. This study underscores the flexibility in GHE design and construction with a low risk of thermal yield variations due to uncertainties, particularly with a separation-to-shank distance ratio between 0.5 and 1.5 in a symmetrical distribution.
Keywords: energy piles; loops in parallel; GHE configuration; GHE optimisation; GHE spacing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2580/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2580/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:2580-:d:1402757
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager (indexing@mdpi.com).