A Review Analysis of Electricity Generation Studies with Social Life Cycle Assessment

Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis (), Maria Batsioula, George F. Banias and Evina Katsou
Additional contact information
Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK
Maria Batsioula: Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre for Research and Technology-Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece
George F. Banias: Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre for Research and Technology-Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece
Evina Katsou: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 12, 1-13

Abstract: This review explores the social impacts of electricity production by applying the framework of Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). The authors adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to select studies that were published post-2010 and used S-LCA in the context of various electricity sources, including bioelectricity, solar, wind, and hydropower. The search yielded 13 eligible studies that employed both generic and site-specific assessment strategies, primarily relying on the Social Hotspot Database and Product Social Impact Life Cycle Assessment database for generic evaluations. The findings emphasize the Workers stakeholder as the most frequently examined, with significant attention also given to the Local Community, Society, Value Chain Actors, and Consumer stakeholders when social databases are employed. The studies primarily assessed socioeconomic impact subcategories related to labor practices, health and safety, and economic contributions, as well as a tailored set of self-developed social impacts and indicators specific to the energy sources and geographical contexts examined. This review demonstrates the crucial role of S-LCA in revealing the socio-economic impacts of electricity generation and the need to consider the impacts on Local Community and Society stakeholders through site-specific assessments. Such insights are crucial for guiding policy reforms and industry practices towards more socially responsible energy production.

Keywords: reference scale; PRISMA; PSILCA; SHDB; site-specific; S-LCA; SLCA (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2929/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2929/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2929-:d:1414989

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().