EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

An Experimental Investigation of Surfactant-Stabilized CO 2 Foam Flooding in Carbonate Cores in Reservoir Conditions

Madiyar Koyanbayev (), Randy Doyle Hazlett, Lei Wang and Muhammad Rehan Hashmet
Additional contact information
Madiyar Koyanbayev: School of Mining and Geosciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
Randy Doyle Hazlett: School of Mining and Geosciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
Lei Wang: College of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
Muhammad Rehan Hashmet: Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 13, 1-19

Abstract: Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) injection for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has attracted great attention due to its potential to increase ultimate recovery from mature oil reservoirs. Despite the reported efficiency of CO 2 in enhancing oil recovery, the high mobility of CO 2 in porous media is one of the major issues faced during CO 2 EOR projects. Foam injection is a proven approach to overcome CO 2 mobility problems such as early gas breakthrough and low sweep efficiency. In this experimental study, we investigated the foam performance of a commercial anionic surfactant, alpha olefin sulfonate (AOS), in carbonate core samples for gas mobility control and oil recovery. Bulk foam screening tests demonstrated that varying surfactant concentrations above a threshold value had an insignificant effect on foam volume and half-life. Moreover, foam stability and capacity decreased with increasing temperature, while variations in salinity over the tested range had a negligible influence on foam properties. The pressure drop across a brine-saturated core sample increased with an increasing concentration of surfactant in the injected brine during foam flooding experiments. Co-injection of CO 2 and AOS solution at an optimum concentration and gas fractional flow enhanced oil recovery by 6–10% of the original oil in place (OOIP).

Keywords: CO 2 foam; mobility control; EOR; foam stability; alpha-olefin sulfonate (AOS) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3353/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3353/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3353-:d:1431156

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3353-:d:1431156