A 4E Analysis of a Solar Organic Rankine Cycle Applied to a Paint Shop in the Automotive Industry

Ronaldo Nilo Miyagi Martire (), Mustafa Erguvan and Shahriar Amini ()
Additional contact information
Ronaldo Nilo Miyagi Martire: Dürr Systems Inc., 26801 Northwestern Highway, Southfield, MI 48307, USA
Mustafa Erguvan: Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA
Shahriar Amini: Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 17, 1-23

Abstract: In a conventional automotive manufacturing plant, the paint shop alone can represent 36% of the total energy consumption, making it the most demanding area in terms of electricity and fossil fuel energy consumption. This study explores the possibility of decentralizing the production of electrical power and heat simultaneously, using an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) system integrated with a Parabolic Trough Collector (PTC) in a paint shop. To date, no similar system has been explored or implemented by the automotive industry. To increase the efficiency of the integrated system, wasted heat generated during the paint manufacturing process is recovered and used to pre-heat the organic fluid in the ORC system. A 4E analysis (Energy, Exergy, Economic, and Environmental) is conducted to determine the practical viability of the proposed system. When applied to the southern region of the USA, this system’s installed capacity is projected to be 11 times higher than the two unique SORC pieces of equipment currently running in Louisiana and Florida. The goals are to reduce the reliance on external primary energy sources and decrease the carbon emission footprint from production activity. The system is evaluated for a location in Alabama, USA. The designed SORC, using toluene, can produce 712.2 kW el net and 13,132 kg/h of hot water, with an overall energy efficiency of 31.02%; exergy efficiency of 34.23; and ORC efficiency of 27.70%. This leads to an electrical energy saving of 5.9% for the manufacturing plant. The regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) heat exchanger, the secondary heat source of the system, has the highest exergy destruction—3583 kW. The system avoids the emission of 4521 tCO 2 per year. A payback period of 10.16 years for the proposed system is estimated. Considering a planning horizon of 10 years, the investment in the system is also justified by a benefit–cost analysis.

Keywords: organic Rankine cycle; 4E analysis; paint shop; waste heat recovery; solar energy; automotive industry (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4291/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4291/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4291-:d:1465436

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().