EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Artificial Intelligence-Based Improvement of Empirical Methods for Accurate Global Solar Radiation Forecast: Development and Comparative Analysis

Mohamed A. Ali (), Ashraf Elsayed, Islam Elkabani, Mohammad Akrami (), M. Elsayed Youssef and Gasser E. Hassan
Additional contact information
Mohamed A. Ali: Computer Based Engineering Applications Department, Informatics Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications (SRTA-City), New Borg El-Arab City 21934, Egypt
Ashraf Elsayed: Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Bab Sharqi 21511, Egypt
Islam Elkabani: Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Bab Sharqi 21511, Egypt
Mohammad Akrami: Department of Engineering, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK
M. Elsayed Youssef: Computer Based Engineering Applications Department, Informatics Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications (SRTA-City), New Borg El-Arab City 21934, Egypt
Gasser E. Hassan: Computer Based Engineering Applications Department, Informatics Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications (SRTA-City), New Borg El-Arab City 21934, Egypt

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 17, 1-42

Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has expanded its potential in environmental and renewable energy applications, particularly in the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs) as the most widely used technique. To address the shortage of solar measurement in various places worldwide, several solar radiation methods have been developed to forecast global solar radiation (GSR). With this consideration, this study aims to develop temperature-based GSR models using a commonly utilized approach in machine learning techniques, ANNs, to predict GSR using just temperature data. It also compares the performance of these models to the commonly used empirical technique. Additionally, it develops precise GSR models for five new sites and the entire region, which currently lacks AI-based models despite the presence of proposed solar energy plants in the area. The study also examines the impact of varying lengths of validation datasets on solar radiation models’ prediction and accuracy, which has received little attention. Furthermore, it investigates different ANN architectures for GSR estimation and introduces a comprehensive comparative study. The findings indicate that the most advanced models of both methods accurately predict GSR, with coefficient of determination, R 2 , values ranging from 96% to 98%. Moreover, the local and general formulas of the empirical model exhibit comparable performance at non-coastal sites. Conversely, the local and general ANN-based models perform almost identically, with a high ability to forecast GSR in any location, even during the winter months. Additionally, ANN architectures with fewer neurons in their single hidden layer generally outperform those with more. Furthermore, the efficacy and precision of the models, particularly ANN-based ones, are minimally impacted by the size of the validation data sets. This study also reveals that the performance of the empirical models was significantly influenced by weather conditions such as clouds and rain, especially at coastal sites. In contrast, the ANN-based models were less impacted by such weather variations, with a performance that was approximately 7% better than the empirical ones at coastal sites. The best-developed models, particularly the ANN-based models, are thus highly recommended. They enable the precise and rapid forecast of GSR, which is useful in the design and performance evaluation of various solar applications, with the temperature data continuously and easily recorded for various purposes.

Keywords: solar energy; solar radiation models; artificial intelligence (AI); artificial neural networks (ANNs); empirical models; statistical indicators; Egypt (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4302/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4302/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4302-:d:1466024

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4302-:d:1466024