Integrating Social Aspects into Energy System Modelling Through the Lens of Public Perspectives: A Review

Riasad Amin (), Deepika Mathur, David Ompong and Kerstin K. Zander
Additional contact information
Riasad Amin: Northern Institute, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Dr, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia
Deepika Mathur: Northern Institute, Charles Darwin University, 10 Grevillea Dr, Sadadeen, NT 0870, Australia
David Ompong: Energy and Resources Institute, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Dr, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia
Kerstin K. Zander: Northern Institute, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Dr, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 23, 1-33

Abstract: The energy system model (ESM) predominantly emphasises techno-economic factors and often overlooks the essential social dimensions that are crucial for successful energy transitions. This review investigates the integration of social aspects into energy system models (ESMs) and explores approaches for incorporating public perspectives. Through a systematic literature review utilising the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach (PRISMA), 79 relevant publications were identified. The analysis revealed that while some studies considered socio-economic and socio-environmental elements, these efforts are frequently insufficient to fully comprehend social dynamics. The review highlights the significance of public engagement in ESMs, with 29 studies demonstrating some form of public participation. However, current engagement strategies are often limited to information sharing and consultation, with minimal strong collaboration. This study advocates for the implementation of transparent collaborative approaches in ESMs, including co-creation, active participation, and iterative processes, to enhance the comprehensiveness and societal relevance of models. It also addresses challenges, such as time constraints and the conversion of qualitative inputs into quantitative parameters. The review concludes by calling for further research to develop transparent, iterative frameworks for collaborative approaches in ESMs, emphasising the inclusion of vulnerable population perspectives to ensure equitable energy transitions and more effective, socially acceptable outcomes.

Keywords: energy system model; renewable energy; social aspects; public perspectives; stakeholder engagement; scenario development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/5880/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/5880/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:5880-:d:1527698

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().