EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

10 MW FOWT Semi-Submersible Multi-Objective Optimization: A Comparative Study of PSO, SA, and ACO

Souleymane Drabo, Siqi Lai (), Hongwei Liu and Xiangheng Feng
Additional contact information
Souleymane Drabo: The State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Siqi Lai: Ocean Academy, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316021, China
Hongwei Liu: The State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Xiangheng Feng: The State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 23, 1-23

Abstract: The present study aims to carry out a comparative Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) of a 10 MW FOWT semi-submersible using three different metaheuristic optimization techniques and a sophisticated approach for optimizing a floating platform. This novel framework enables highly efficient 3D plots, an optimization loop, and the automatic and comparative output of solutions. Python, the main interface, integrated PyMAPDL and Pymoo for intricate modeling and simulation tasks. For this case study, the ZJUS10 Floating Offshore Wind Turbine (FOWT) platform, developed by the state key laboratory of mechatronics and fluid power at Zhejiang University, was employed as the basis. Key criteria such as platform stability, overall structural mass, and stress were pivotal in formulating the objective functions. Based on a preliminary study, the three metaheuristic optimization algorithms chosen for optimization were Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated Annealing (SA), and Ant Colony Optimization (ACO). Then, the solutions were evaluated based on Pareto dominance, leading to a Pareto front, a curve that represents the best possible trade-offs among the objectives. Each algorithm’s convergence was meticulously evaluated, leading to the selection of the optimal design solution. The results evaluated in simulations elucidate the strengths and limitations of each optimization method, providing valuable insights into their efficacy for complex engineering design challenges. In the post-processing phase, the performances of the optimized FOWT platforms were thoroughly compared both among themselves and with the original model, resulting in validation. Finally, the ACO algorithm delivered a highly effective solution within the framework, achieving reductions of 19.8% in weight, 40.1% in pitch, and 12.7% in stress relative to the original model.

Keywords: renewable energy; Floating Offshore Wind Turbine; metaheuristic; evolutionary algorithms; Particle Swarm Optimization; ant colony analysis; Simulated Annealing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/5914/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/5914/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:5914-:d:1529066

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:5914-:d:1529066