Aspects of Modeling Coal Enrichment Processes by Gravity Methods

Agnieszka Surowiak (), Tomasz Niedoba and Mustapha Wahman
Additional contact information
Agnieszka Surowiak: Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, Al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
Tomasz Niedoba: Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, Al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
Mustapha Wahman: Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, Al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 23, 1-17

Abstract: This study examines the challenges associated with processing hard coal, with a specific focus on gravitational enrichment methods and the utilization of jigs for coal separation. The research involves the simulation and modeling of physical property distributions and the analysis of both the feed density distribution and the characteristics of the enrichment products. Findings indicate that the resultant density distributions are influenced not only by the gravitational enrichment process but also by the preceding procedures and the inherent properties of the coal, such as particle size, sulfur content, and ash content, all of which significantly affect the quality of the outcomes. In modeling and optimization efforts, the study emphasizes approximating grain density using selected statistical distributions—specifically, the Weibull, logistic, and Gaudin–Schuhmann–Andreyev (GSA) distributions—before and after the enrichment process. Statistical analyses demonstrate that the GSA distribution most accurately fits the grain density distribution in the feed, while the Weibull distribution provides the best approximation for the separation products. The quality of these approximations was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and the Mean Squared Error (MSE). The best quality of approximation for feed was obtained by means of the GSA distribution function, and the MSE was approximately 3.1 for two analyzed values of feed flow rates. In the case of concentrates and tailings, the results are not unequivocal.

Keywords: mineral processing; enrichment; coal; mathematical modeling; particle density approximation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/6166/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/6166/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6166-:d:1538523

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().