A Critical Review of Overheating Risk Assessment Criteria in International and National Regulations—Gaps and Suggestions for Improvements
Mahsan Sadeghi (),
Dong Chen and
Anthony Wright
Additional contact information
Mahsan Sadeghi: Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Melbourne 3168, Australia
Dong Chen: Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Melbourne 3168, Australia
Anthony Wright: Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Melbourne 3168, Australia
Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 24, 1-20
Abstract:
The escalating environmental threat of indoor overheating, exacerbated by global climate change, urbanisation, and population growth, poses a severe risk to public health worldwide, specifically to those regions which are exposed to extreme heat events, such as Australia. This study delves into the critical issue of overheating within residential buildings, examining the existing state of knowledge on overheating criteria and reviewing overheating guidelines embedded in (a) international standards and (b) national building codes. Each regulatory document is analysed based on its underlying thermal comfort model, metric, and indices. The advantages and limitations of each document are practically discussed and for each legislative document and standard, and the quantitative measures have been reviewed, analysed, and summarised. The findings illuminate a global reliance on simplistic indices, such as indoor air temperature and operative temperature, in the existing regulatory documents. However, other critical environmental parameters, such as relative humidity, indoor air velocity, and physiological parameters including metabolic heat production and clothing insulation, are often not included. The absence of mandatory regulations for overheating criteria in residential buildings in some countries, such as in Australian homes, prompts the call for a holistic approach based on a thermal index inclusive of relevant environmental and physiological parameters to quantify heat stress exposure based on human thermal regulation. Gaps and limitations within existing guidelines are identified, and recommendations are proposed to strengthen the regulatory framework for overheating risk assessment in residential buildings. The findings hold significance for policymakers, building energy assessors, architects, and public health professionals, providing direction for the improvement of existing, and development of new, guidelines that aim to enhance indoor thermal condition and population health while ensuring energy efficiency and sustainability in the building stock.
Keywords: overheating; residential buildings; international standards; national building codes; PMV; adaptive thermal comfort; building simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6354/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6354/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6354-:d:1545932
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().