Steady- and Transient-State CFD Simulations of a Modified Barra–Costantini Solar System in Comparison with a Traditional Trombe–Michel Wall

Sandra Corasaniti (), Luca Manni, Ivano Petracci and Michele Potenza
Additional contact information
Sandra Corasaniti: Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via del Politecnico n.1, 00133 Rome, Italy
Luca Manni: Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via del Politecnico n.1, 00133 Rome, Italy
Ivano Petracci: Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via del Politecnico n.1, 00133 Rome, Italy
Michele Potenza: Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via del Politecnico n.1, 00133 Rome, Italy

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 2, 1-17

Abstract: Passive solar systems are one of most important strategies to reduce the heating loads of buildings. The Trombe–Michel (TM) wall and its variants are some of the better-known structures in the field of solar systems. An alternative to the TM wall is the Barra–Costantini (BC) system. In the present paper, CFD numerical simulations, both in steady and transient states, of modified BC and TM walls were carried out in the winter season. Different interspace thicknesses were simulated in order to evaluate their effects on the temperature field and air velocity, and the numerical results were compared among them. It was found that the BC system offers greater hot air flow compared with the TM wall; the mass flow rate increased up to 43% in the BC system and up 28% in the TM system when the interlayer thickness was increased by 500%. The transient simulations (100 h simulated) demonstrated that the dynamic response of the BC wall was shorter than that of the TM wall, even when the TM wall was simulated with initial thermal conditions that were more advantageous than those for the BC wall. The BC system reached a periodic stabilized regime within 24 h, whereas the TM system failed to stabilize in 100 h. The results show that for both TM and BC structures, the interlayer thickness scarcely influenced the temperature of the environment reached (the temperature peak increased up to 3–4% as the interlayer thickness was increased by 500%), while larger air speed changes were observed in the BC system in the transient state compared with the TM system. Thus, in the TM system, the outlet air velocity was practically constant as the interlayer thickness was increased; in contrast, the outlet velocity peak increased up to 50% in the BC system. Moreover, the BC wall presented a quicker response to satisfy the ambient thermal loads.

Keywords: energy efficiency; Barra–Costantini wall; Trombe–Michel wall; passive solar system (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/295/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/295/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:295-:d:1314548

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().