EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Retrofitting Biomass Combined Heat and Power Plant for Biofuel Production—A Detailed Techno-Economic Analysis

Hao Chen (), Erik Dahlquist and Konstantinos Kyprianidis
Additional contact information
Hao Chen: School of Business, Society and Engineering, Mälardalen University, P.O. Box 883, 721 23 Västerås, Sweden
Erik Dahlquist: School of Business, Society and Engineering, Mälardalen University, P.O. Box 883, 721 23 Västerås, Sweden
Konstantinos Kyprianidis: School of Business, Society and Engineering, Mälardalen University, P.O. Box 883, 721 23 Västerås, Sweden

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 2, 1-23

Abstract: Existing combined heat and power plants usually operate on part-load conditions during low heating demand seasons. Similarly, there are boilers designated for winter use that remain inactive for much of the year. This brings a concern about the inefficiency of resource utilization. Retrofitting existing CHP plants (especially for those with spare boilers) for biofuel production could increase revenue and enhance resource efficiency. This study introduces a novel approach that combines biomass gasification and pyrolysis in a polygeneration process that is based on utilizing existing CHP facilities to produce biomethane, bio-oil, and hydrogen. In this work, a detailed analysis was undertaken of retrofitting an existing biomass combined heat and power plant for biofuel production. The biofuel production plant is designed to explore the polygeneration of hydrogen, biomethane, and bio-oil via the integration of gasification, pyrolysis, and renewable-powered electrolysis. An Aspen Plus model of the proposed biofuel production plant is established followed by a performance investigation of the biofuel production plant under various design conditions. An economic analysis is carried out to examine the profitability of the proposed polygeneration system. Results show that the proposed polygeneration system can achieve 40% carbon efficiency with a payback period of 9 years and an internal rate of return of 17.5%, without the integration of renewable hydrogen. When integrated with renewable-power electrolysis, the carbon efficiency could be significantly improved to approximately 90%; however, the high investment cost associated with the electrolyzer system makes this integration economically unfavorable.

Keywords: biofuel; biomass; existing CHP plants; process modeling; techno-economic analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/522/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/522/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:522-:d:1323864

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-05
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:522-:d:1323864