Costs of Coal Abatement for Residential Heating to Reduce Urban Air Pollution in Asian Russia: Evidence from Krasnoyarsk

Ekaterina A. Syrtsova (), Ekaterina D. Ivantsova, Alexandra S. Miskiv, Evgeniya V. Zander and Anton I. Pyzhev
Additional contact information
Ekaterina A. Syrtsova: Laboratory for Economics of Climate Change and Environmental Development, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Ekaterina D. Ivantsova: Laboratory for Economics of Climate Change and Environmental Development, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Alexandra S. Miskiv: Laboratory for Economics of Climate Change and Environmental Development, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Evgeniya V. Zander: Laboratory for Economics of Climate Change and Environmental Development, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Anton I. Pyzhev: Laboratory for Economics of Climate Change and Environmental Development, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 3, 1-15

Abstract: Heat and electricity generation are major sources of air pollution in many large cities worldwide. In Siberian cities, the heat supply significantly contributes to air pollution, as coal remains the primary energy fuel in most of Asian Russia. Krasnoyarsk, the second-largest city in the macro-region by population, serves as a clear example of urban air pollution. In recent years, public authorities have implemented several measures to reduce pollutant emissions. These measures include modernizing thermal power stations, replacing inefficient small boiler houses, and converting residential heating to more environmentally friendly types of fuel. However, our analysis shows that these policies have not yet resulted in a significant transition away from using coal for heating. One of the primary reasons is that alternative fuels are unable to compete with coal in terms of price. The proposal suggests transitioning private households to pellet heating. Our goal is to evaluate the potential environmental and economic impacts of this measure. We estimate the necessary subsidy size for the successful implementation of both initiatives. In conclusion, converting households from coal to pellet heating can reduce the emissions of nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, sulfur oxides, and suspended particles by 0.2%, 8.5%, 4.4%, and 2.7%, respectively, of the total pollutant emissions in Krasnoyarsk. Furthermore, this conversion can provide economic benefits by supporting local pellet producers who heavily rely on export markets. If practically implemented, the proposed approach could solve one of the most significant development issues of one of the largest Russian cities within a few years, with only 2.5% of the annual city budget expenditure.

Keywords: urban air pollution; environmental policy; coal abatement; private households; stand-alone heating sources; wood pellets; Krasnoyarsk; Eastern Siberia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/640/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/640/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:640-:d:1328609

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().