A Techno-Economic Analysis Comparing a Hammermill and a Rotary Shear System to Process Woody Biomass for Biofuel Production

Carlos O. Trejo-Pech, Tun-hsiang Yu, David N. Lanning, James H. Dooley, James A. Larson and Burton English
Additional contact information
Carlos O. Trejo-Pech: Agricultural and Resource Economics Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
David N. Lanning: Forest Concepts LLC, Auburn, WA 98001, USA
James H. Dooley: Forest Concepts LLC, Auburn, WA 98001, USA
James A. Larson: Agricultural and Resource Economics Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 4, 1-19

Abstract: Woody biomass feedstock processing, including sorting, drying, and size reduction of biomass to provide standardized reactor-ready biomass to the biorefinery, is crucial to biofuel conversion. This study compares two comminution technology systems applied to woody biomass processing at a depot before being utilized for biofuel production at a biorefinery. The conventional comminution technology, known as the hammermill system, is compared with a rotary shear system developed by Forest Concepts™. Potential economic savings of using the new technology are evaluated by applying a deterministic and a stochastic partial capital budgeting model based on results from an experiment that processed chipped hybrid poplar chips and forest residues with both systems. The stochastic partial capital model estimates that savings will vary between approximately USD 28 and USD 42 per ton of reactor-ready processed biomass, with mean and median values around USD 34 per ton. It is 90% likely that savings will be between USD 30 and USD 39 per ton of reactor-ready processed biomass. The estimated savings are mainly due to differences in input (feedstock) to output (reactor-ready biomass) yields between technologies, affecting feedstock and drying costs.

Keywords: techno-economic analysis; partial capital budgeting; stochastic model; hammermill and rotary shear; agricultural finance; biofuel (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/4/886/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/4/886/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:886-:d:1338833

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().