Techno-Economic Comparison of Low-Carbon Energy Carriers Based on Electricity for Air Mobility

Jean-Baptiste Jarin (), Stéphane Beddok and Carole Haritchabalet
Additional contact information
Jean-Baptiste Jarin: Universite de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, E2S UPPA, CNRS, TREE, 64000 Pau, France
Stéphane Beddok: Safran Helicopter Engines, 64510 Bordes, France
Carole Haritchabalet: Universite de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, E2S UPPA, CNRS, TREE, 64000 Pau, France

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 5, 1-16

Abstract: The decarbonization of air mobility requires the decarbonization of its energy. While biofuels will play an important role, other low-carbon energy carriers based on electricity are considered, such as battery electrification and liquid hydrogen (LH 2 ) or eFuel, a hydrogen-based energy carrier. Each energy carrier has its own conversion steps and losses and its own integration effects with aircraft. These combinations lead to different energy requirements and must be understood in order to compare their cost and CO 2 emissions. Since they are all electricity-based, this study compares these energy carriers using the well-to-rotor methodology when applied to a standard vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) air mobility mission. This novel approach allows one to understand that the choice of energy carrier dictates the propulsive system architecture, leading to integration effects with aircraft, which can significantly change the energy required for the same mission, increasing it from 400 to 2665 kWh. These deviations led to significant differences in CO 2 emissions and costs. Battery electrification is impacted by battery manufacturing but has the lowest electricity consumption. This is an optimum solution, but only until the battery weight can be lifted. In all scenarios, eFuel is more efficient than LH 2 . We conclude that using the most efficient molecule in an aircraft can compensate for the extra energy cost spent on the ground. Finally, we found that, for each of these energy carriers, it is the electricity carbon intensity and price which will dictate the cost and CO 2 emissions of an air mobility mission.

Keywords: air mobility; eFuel; hydrogen; battery; electricity; CO 2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1151/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1151/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:1151-:d:1347926

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().