Limitations of Upper Protective Layers as Pressure Relief Measures for Extra-Thick Coal Seam Mining: Insights from a Case Study

Yanjiang Chai, Linming Dou (), Jiang He, Xiaotao Ma, Fangzhou Lu and Hu He
Additional contact information
Yanjiang Chai: School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Linming Dou: School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Jiang He: School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Xiaotao Ma: School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Fangzhou Lu: School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Hu He: School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 6, 1-20

Abstract: Upper protective layer (UPL) mining is extensively utilised as a pressure relief strategy to prevent outbursts and coal bursts. However, when the excavation height of the protected layer is substantial, the depressurisation efficacy of the protective layer may be diminished. This paper takes the Haishiwan coal mine in China as a case study and explores the stress evolution and influencing factors in the mining of extra-thick coal seam beneath the protective layer through theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and field observation. The results indicate that increasing the excavation height of the coal seam will lead to the upward development of the collapse zone in the overburden of the goaf, with the “masonry beam” structure formed at a higher position by key strata blocks. The overburden above the masonry beam will be supported by the coal rock masse on both sides of the structure, leading to increased stress on the coal seam near the goaf and eliminating the depressurisation effect of the protective layer. Numerical simulation shows that factors such as faults, protective layers, interlayer spacing, and the height of coal seam excavation significantly affect the stress distribution in the protected layer. With the increase in interlayer spacing and the thickness of coal seam extraction, the stress reduction phenomenon of the UPL gradually decreases, especially with an abnormal stress concentration of the gob-side coal seam. Observations of Surface subsidence and the distribution of mining-induced seismic events corroborate the conclusions of theoretical analysis and numerical simulations. The results offer valuable guidance for the mining of extra-thick coal seams and the selection of the UPL.

Keywords: thick coal seam; protective seam; stress reduction; interlayer spacing; induced seismicity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1446/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1446/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1446-:d:1358685

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().