EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Potentials of Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP)-Based Optimization for Low-Carbon Hydrogen Production and Development Pathways in China

Jiani Mao (), Guangxue Zhang, Zhongqian Ling, Dingkun Yuan, Maosheng Liu and Jiangrong Xu
Additional contact information
Jiani Mao: College of Energy Environment and Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Guangxue Zhang: College of Energy Environment and Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Zhongqian Ling: College of Energy Environment and Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Dingkun Yuan: College of Energy Environment and Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Maosheng Liu: College of Energy Environment and Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Jiangrong Xu: College of Energy Environment and Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China

Energies, 2024, vol. 17, issue 7, 1-18

Abstract: Hydrogen (H 2 ) is considered one of the main pillars for transforming the conventional “dark” energy system to a net-zero carbon or “green” energy system. This work reviewed the potential resources for producing low-carbon hydrogen in China, as well as the possible hydrogen production methods based on the available resources. The analysis and comparison of the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) for different hydrogen production pathways, and the optimal technology mixes to produce H 2 in China from 2020 to 2050 were obtained using the mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) optimization model. The results were concluded as three major ones: (a) By 2050, the LCOH of solar- and onshore-wind-powered hydrogen will reach around 70–80 $/MWh, which is lower than the current H2 price and the future low-carbon H 2 price. (b) Fuel costs (>40%) and capital investments (~20%) of different hydrogen technologies are the major cost components, and also are the major direction to further reduce the hydrogen price. (c) For the optimal hydrogen technology mix under the higher renewable ratio (70%) in 2050, the installed capacities of the renewable-powered electrolysers are all more than 200 GW, and the overall LCOH is 68.46 $/MWh. This value is higher than the LCOH (62.95 $/MWh) of the scenario with higher coal gasification with carbon capture and the storage (CG-CCS) ratio (>50%). Overall, this work is the first time that hydrogen production methods in China has been discussed comprehensively, as well as the acquisition of the optimal H2 production technology mix by the MILP optimization model, which can provide guidance on future hydrogen development pathways and technology development potential in China.

Keywords: low-carbon hydrogen; renewable hydrogen; levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH); mixed-integer linear programming (MILP); optimal technology mix (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1694/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1694/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1694-:d:1369024

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1694-:d:1369024