Thermodynamic and Process Modeling of CO 2 Chemical Absorption Process Using Aqueous Monoethanolamine and Enzymatic Potassium Carbonate Solvents: Validation and Comparative Analysis

Anthoula Plakia (), Christina Papaioannou and Panagiotis Grammelis ()
Additional contact information
Anthoula Plakia: Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Egialias 52, 15125 Athens, Greece
Christina Papaioannou: Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Egialias 52, 15125 Athens, Greece
Panagiotis Grammelis: Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Egialias 52, 15125 Athens, Greece

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 11, 1-21

Abstract: Carbon dioxide is a major contributor to global warming, with chemical absorption using aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) being the most widespread technology for CO 2 capture. However, due to the limitations of MEA, alternative solvents should be examined. In this work, CO 2 capture using potassium carbonate promoted by the enzyme carbonic anhydrase is compared to the conventional aqueous MEA solvent. For that purpose, models for both solvents are developed, focusing on accurate thermodynamic modeling of the mixtures and simulation of the processes. As a first step, the thermodynamic modeling of CO 2 -H 2 O-MEA and CO 2 -H 2 O-K 2 CO 3 mixtures is examined. Parameters of the electrolyte non-random two-liquid (eNRTL) model in Aspen Plus V11 are updated through regression against binary and ternary solubility and heat capacity experimental data. The regression results are satisfactory. Afterwards, the updated eNRTL is applied to the development of rate-based process models, which are validated against experimental results from pilot plants presented in the literature to ensure their accuracy. Finally, the two solvents are compared, with enzymatic potassium carbonate emerging as a promising alternative to MEA for CO 2 capture. At optimized conditions and an 85% capture efficiency, the reboiler duties are 3.5 MJ/kg for enzymatic potassium carbonate and 4.2 MJ/kg CO 2 for MEA.

Keywords: carbon dioxide; monoethanolamine; enzymatic potassium carbonate; carbonic anhydrase; eNRTL; process model; Aspen Plus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2981/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2981/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2981-:d:1672370

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().