Radiological Assessment of Coal Fly Ash from Polish Power and Cogeneration Plants: Implications for Energy Waste Management

Krzysztof Isajenko, Barbara Piotrowska, Mirosław Szyłak-Szydłowski, Magdalena Reizer (), Katarzyna Maciejewska and Małgorzata Kwestarz
Additional contact information
Krzysztof Isajenko: Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, 7 Konwaliowa Street, 03-194 Warsaw, Poland
Barbara Piotrowska: Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, 7 Konwaliowa Street, 03-194 Warsaw, Poland
Mirosław Szyłak-Szydłowski: Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 20 Street, 00-653 Warsaw, Poland
Magdalena Reizer: Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 20 Street, 00-653 Warsaw, Poland
Katarzyna Maciejewska: Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 20 Street, 00-653 Warsaw, Poland
Małgorzata Kwestarz: Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 20 Street, 00-653 Warsaw, Poland

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 12, 1-22

Abstract: The combustion of hard coal and lignite in power and combined heat and power plants generates significant amounts of coal fly ash (CFA), a waste material with variable properties. CFA naturally contains radionuclides, specifically naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs), which pose potential radiological risks to the environment and human health during their storage and utilization, including their incorporation into building materials. Although global research on the radionuclide content in CFA is available, there is a clear gap in detailed and current data specific to Central and Eastern Europe and notably, a lack of a systematic analysis investigating the influence of installed power plant capacity on the concentration profile of these radionuclides in the generated ash. This study aimed to fill this gap and provide crucial data for the Polish energy and environmental context. The objective was to evaluate the concentrations of selected radionuclides ( 232 Th, 226 Ra, and 40 K) in coal fly ash samples collected between 2020 and 2023 from 19 Polish power and combined heat and power plants with varying capacities (categorized into four groups: S1–S4) and to assess the associated radiological risk. Radionuclide concentrations were determined using gamma spectrometry, and differences between groups were analyzed using non-parametric statistical methods, including PERMANOVA. The results demonstrated that plant capacity has a statistically significant influence on the concentration profiles of thorium and potassium but not radium. Calculated radiological hazard assessment factors (Ra eq , H ex , H in , IAED) revealed that although most samples fall near regulatory limits (e.g., 370 Bq kg −1 for Ra eq ), some exceed these limits, particularly in groups S1 (plants with a capacity less than 300 MW) and S4 (plants with a capacity higher than 300 MW). It was also found that the frequency of exceeding the annual effective dose limits (IAEDs) showed an increasing trend with the increasing installed capacity of the facility. These findings underscore the importance of plant capacity as a key factor to consider in the radiological risk assessment associated with coal fly ash. This study’s outcomes are crucial for informing environmental risk management strategies, guiding safe waste processing practices, and shaping environmental policies within the energy sector in Central and Eastern European countries, including Poland.

Keywords: environmental risk assessment; coal fly ash; gamma spectrometry; radionuclides; potassium; radium; thorium; power plant; heat and power plant; radiological hazard (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/12/3010/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/12/3010/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:12:p:3010-:d:1673227

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().