EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Simulation Study on Key Controlling Factors of Productivity of Multi-Branch Horizontal Wells for CBM: A Case Study of Zhina Coalfield, Guizhou, China

Shaolei Wang, Yu Xiong (), Huazhou Huang (), Shiliang Zhu, Junhui Zhu and Xiaozhi Zhou
Additional contact information
Shaolei Wang: Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Evaluation and Development in Complex Tectonic Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guiyang 550009, China
Yu Xiong: Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources & Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
Huazhou Huang: Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources & Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
Shiliang Zhu: China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Xi’an Research Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710077, China
Junhui Zhu: Shenhua Geological Exploration Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China
Xiaozhi Zhou: Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources & Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 17, 1-20

Abstract: The multi-branch horizontal well for coalbed methane (CBM) is a core technical means to achieve efficient CBM extraction, and its productivity is jointly restricted by geological and engineering factors. To accurately grasp the main controlling factors of the productivity of multi-branch horizontal wells and provide a scientific basis for the optimized design of CBM development, this study takes Well W1 in the Wenjiaba Coal Mine of the Zhina Coalfield in Guizhou, China, as an engineering example and comprehensively uses three-dimensional geological modeling and reservoir numerical simulation methods to systematically explore the key influencing factors of the productivity of multi-branch horizontal wells for CBM. This study shows that coal seam thickness, permeability, gas content, and branch borehole size are positively correlated with the productivity of multi-branch horizontal wells. With the simulation time set to 1500 days, when the coal seam thickness increases from 1.5 m to 4 m, the cumulative gas production increases by 166%; when the permeability increases from 0.2 mD to 0.8 mD, the cumulative gas production increases by 123%; when the coal seam gas content increases from 8 m 3 /t to 18 m 3 /t, the cumulative gas production increases by 543%; and when the wellbore size increases from 114.3 mm to 177.8 mm, the cumulative gas production increases by 8%. However, the impact of branch angle and spacing on productivity exhibits complex nonlinear trends: when the branch angle is in the range of 15–30°, the cumulative gas production shows an upward trend during the simulation period, while in the range of 30–75°, the cumulative gas production decreases during the simulation period; the cumulative gas production with branch spacing of 100 m and 150 m is significantly higher than that with spacing of 50 m and 200 m. Quantitative analysis through sensitivity coefficients reveals that the coal seam gas content is the most important geological influencing factor, with a sensitivity coefficient of 2.5952; a branch angle of 30° and a branch spacing of 100 m are the optimal engineering conditions for improving productivity, with sensitivity coefficients of 0.2875 and 0.273, respectively. The research results clarify the action mechanism of geological and engineering factors on the productivity of multi-branch horizontal wells for CBM, providing a theoretical basis for the optimized deployment of well locations, wellbore structure, and drilling trajectory design of multi-branch horizontal wells for CBM in areas with similar geological conditions.

Keywords: Wenjiaba Coal Mine Area; coalbed methane development; multi-branch horizontal well; productivity influencing factors; reservoir numerical simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4496/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4496/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4496-:d:1731318

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Cassie Shen

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-08-28
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4496-:d:1731318