Hybrid PCM–Liquid Cooling System with Optimized Channel Design for Enhanced Thermal Management of Lithium–Ion Batteries
Su Woong Hyun,
Jae Hyuk Kim and
Dong Ho Shin ()
Additional contact information
Su Woong Hyun: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul, 30 Pildong-Ro 1-Gil, Jung-Gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
Jae Hyuk Kim: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul, 30 Pildong-Ro 1-Gil, Jung-Gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
Dong Ho Shin: Department of Mechanical, Robotics and Energy Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul, 30 Pildong-Ro 1-Gil, Jung-Gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 18, 1-22
Abstract:
The increasing demand for high-efficiency cooling technologies necessitates improved methods to prevent degradation and ensure reliable operation of lithium–ion batteries. Conventional PCM (phase change material)-based cooling systems are limited by low thermal conductivity and uneven phase change processes, which lead to non-uniform thermal distribution and diminished performance. In response to these challenges, this study introduces a hybrid thermal management system that combines an indirect liquid-cooling structure with multiple cooling channel configurations within a PCM-based battery pack. Numerical simulations were conducted to systematically assess the thermal performance of the proposed design. Experimental validation with various cooling media showed that PCM achieved the greatest reduction in temperature (47%) and the longest isothermal duration (56 min) under air-cooled conditions, surpassing thermally conductive adhesive (40%) and silicone oil (26%) for temperature decrease. Vertical temperature differentials were effectively reduced, staying below only 2 °C for silicone oil and reaching a maximum of 4 °C for PCM. Phase change evaluation indicated that after 30 min of operation, only 37% of the PCM volume had melted, highlighting localized constraints in heat transfer. Comparative analysis among four liquid-cooling channel arrangements (A–D) and a standalone PCM system demonstrated that configuration D exhibited the highest cooling capability, lowering the battery surface temperature by as much as 9 °C (17.8%). Flow rate analysis determined that increases above 0.2 L/min resulted in only modest thermal improvements (<1 °C), with 0.108 L/min identified as the most efficient rate. Relative to PCM-only designs, the advanced hybrid cooling system achieved significantly enhanced thermal regulation and temperature uniformity, underscoring its promise as a superior solution for lithium–ion battery thermal management.
Keywords: Li–ion battery; battery thermal management system; isothermal; phase change material; cooling material; cooling channel (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/4996/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/4996/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:4996-:d:1753712
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Cassie Shen
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().